×




Patricia Ostrander Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Patricia Ostrander case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Patricia Ostrander case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Nancy F. Koehn, Donald J. Edwards, Antonio F. Weiss. The Patricia Ostrander (referred as “Ostrander Patricia” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial markets, Mergers & acquisitions, Regulation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Patricia Ostrander Case Study


Analyzes the career of former money manager Patricia Ostrander. Focuses on Ostrander's purchase of stock warrants issued in connection with the 1985 leveraged buyout of Storer Communications and on her later indictment and conviction for accepting unlawful compensation. At the broadest level, the case examines the financial, economic, legal, and moral consequences of capital market activities in the 1980s.


Case Authors : Nancy F. Koehn, Donald J. Edwards, Antonio F. Weiss

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Financial markets, Mergers & acquisitions, Regulation




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Patricia Ostrander Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024832) -10024832 - -
Year 1 3452219 -6572613 3452219 0.9434 3256810
Year 2 3968927 -2603686 7421146 0.89 3532331
Year 3 3936154 1332468 11357300 0.8396 3304871
Year 4 3231624 4564092 14588924 0.7921 2559749
TOTAL 14588924 12653761




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2628929

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Ostrander Patricia have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Ostrander Patricia shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Patricia Ostrander

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Ostrander Patricia often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Ostrander Patricia needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024832) -10024832 - -
Year 1 3452219 -6572613 3452219 0.8696 3001930
Year 2 3968927 -2603686 7421146 0.7561 3001079
Year 3 3936154 1332468 11357300 0.6575 2588085
Year 4 3231624 4564092 14588924 0.5718 1847692
TOTAL 10438785


The Net NPV after 4 years is 413953

(10438785 - 10024832 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024832) -10024832 - -
Year 1 3452219 -6572613 3452219 0.8333 2876849
Year 2 3968927 -2603686 7421146 0.6944 2756199
Year 3 3936154 1332468 11357300 0.5787 2277867
Year 4 3231624 4564092 14588924 0.4823 1558461
TOTAL 9469376


The Net NPV after 4 years is -555456

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9469376 - 10024832 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Ostrander Patricia to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Ostrander Patricia has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Ostrander Patricia can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Ostrander Patricia, then the stock price of the Ostrander Patricia should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Ostrander Patricia should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Patricia Ostrander

References & Further Readings

Nancy F. Koehn, Donald J. Edwards, Antonio F. Weiss (2018), "Patricia Ostrander Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


China Jishan Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Tibet Tianlu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


STG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Axovant Sciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Swedbank A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


UCB SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Major Drugs


Brilliance China Automotive SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Aberforth Split Level SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Xingda Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Bombardier A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense