×




Siam Canadian Foods Co. Ltd. Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Siam Canadian Foods Co. Ltd. case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Siam Canadian Foods Co. Ltd. case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John R. Kennedy, Anthony S. Frost, Tom Gleave. The Siam Canadian Foods Co. Ltd. (referred as “Burma Gulkin” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Ethics, Marketing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Siam Canadian Foods Co. Ltd. Case Study


In July 1996, Jim Gulkin, managing director and founder of Bangkok-based Siam Canadian Foods Co. Ltd., was considering the emerging business opportunities in neighboring Burma (also known as Myanmar). Although relatively undeveloped compared to the rest of Southeast Asia, Burma had been experiencing increasing levels of foreign investment activity in recent years. Gulkin, who had considered entering Burma in the past but declined, needed to determine whether the time was now appropriate for him to enter the market.


Case Authors : John R. Kennedy, Anthony S. Frost, Tom Gleave

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Ethics, Marketing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Siam Canadian Foods Co. Ltd. Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004826) -10004826 - -
Year 1 3452653 -6552173 3452653 0.9434 3257220
Year 2 3959336 -2592837 7411989 0.89 3523795
Year 3 3969718 1376881 11381707 0.8396 3333052
Year 4 3241052 4617933 14622759 0.7921 2567217
TOTAL 14622759 12681283




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2676457

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Burma Gulkin shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Burma Gulkin have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Siam Canadian Foods Co. Ltd.

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Burma Gulkin often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Burma Gulkin needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004826) -10004826 - -
Year 1 3452653 -6552173 3452653 0.8696 3002307
Year 2 3959336 -2592837 7411989 0.7561 2993827
Year 3 3969718 1376881 11381707 0.6575 2610154
Year 4 3241052 4617933 14622759 0.5718 1853082
TOTAL 10459370


The Net NPV after 4 years is 454544

(10459370 - 10004826 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004826) -10004826 - -
Year 1 3452653 -6552173 3452653 0.8333 2877211
Year 2 3959336 -2592837 7411989 0.6944 2749539
Year 3 3969718 1376881 11381707 0.5787 2297291
Year 4 3241052 4617933 14622759 0.4823 1563007
TOTAL 9487048


The Net NPV after 4 years is -517778

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487048 - 10004826 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Burma Gulkin to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Burma Gulkin has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Burma Gulkin can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Burma Gulkin, then the stock price of the Burma Gulkin should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Burma Gulkin should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Siam Canadian Foods Co. Ltd.

References & Further Readings

John R. Kennedy, Anthony S. Frost, Tom Gleave (2018), "Siam Canadian Foods Co. Ltd. Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Astral SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Eris Lifesciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Berkshire SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Pingtan Marine SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


Spancrete SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Hansol Pns SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Office Supplies


Yujin Robot SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Henan Lingrui Pharm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs