×




Confectionary Industry: Latin America and the Global Industry in 2006 Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Confectionary Industry: Latin America and the Global Industry in 2006 case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Confectionary Industry: Latin America and the Global Industry in 2006 case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Bruce McKern, Marisol Vidal Palma. The Confectionary Industry: Latin America and the Global Industry in 2006 (referred as “Confectionary Industry” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Globalization, Growth strategy, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Confectionary Industry: Latin America and the Global Industry in 2006 Case Study


In 2006, the confectionary industry is one of the most dynamic and innovative sectors within the food industry. Although its fragmented nature across the globe allows the entrance of new competitors, consumers favor established brands and new entrants are required to make large investments in marketing and advertising to build brand awareness. As opposed to other food segments, the confectionary industry also depends on consumer impulse purchases, which challenge emerging and established manufacturers to preserve affordability, availability, and attractive packaging and presentation of their products. Moreover, new product development is essential to protecting and increasing market share, with changes in consumer attitudes and preferences demanding ongoing innovation in new areas such as "limited editions," "sugar-free" products, and new product lines. Explores the global confectionary industry in 2006 and also examines specific forces at play in the Latin American confectionary market.


Case Authors : Bruce McKern, Marisol Vidal Palma

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Globalization, Growth strategy, Strategic planning




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Confectionary Industry: Latin America and the Global Industry in 2006 Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009363) -10009363 - -
Year 1 3457966 -6551397 3457966 0.9434 3262232
Year 2 3971366 -2580031 7429332 0.89 3534502
Year 3 3944649 1364618 11373981 0.8396 3312003
Year 4 3248559 4613177 14622540 0.7921 2573163
TOTAL 14622540 12681900




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2672537

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Confectionary Industry have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Confectionary Industry shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Confectionary Industry: Latin America and the Global Industry in 2006

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Confectionary Industry often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Confectionary Industry needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009363) -10009363 - -
Year 1 3457966 -6551397 3457966 0.8696 3006927
Year 2 3971366 -2580031 7429332 0.7561 3002923
Year 3 3944649 1364618 11373981 0.6575 2593671
Year 4 3248559 4613177 14622540 0.5718 1857374
TOTAL 10460895


The Net NPV after 4 years is 451532

(10460895 - 10009363 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009363) -10009363 - -
Year 1 3457966 -6551397 3457966 0.8333 2881638
Year 2 3971366 -2580031 7429332 0.6944 2757893
Year 3 3944649 1364618 11373981 0.5787 2282783
Year 4 3248559 4613177 14622540 0.4823 1566628
TOTAL 9488942


The Net NPV after 4 years is -520421

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488942 - 10009363 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Confectionary Industry to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Confectionary Industry has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Confectionary Industry can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Confectionary Industry, then the stock price of the Confectionary Industry should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Confectionary Industry should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Confectionary Industry: Latin America and the Global Industry in 2006

References & Further Readings

Bruce McKern, Marisol Vidal Palma (2018), "Confectionary Industry: Latin America and the Global Industry in 2006 Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Atomix SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Energy Transfer SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


Mobile Streams SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


BELLSYSTEM24 SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Biken Techno SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Carlsberg Brewery SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Greattown A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Hong Leong Finance Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Castrol India SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


OKYO Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining