P.T. Semen Gresik Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for P.T. Semen Gresik case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. P.T. Semen Gresik case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael Moffett. The P.T. Semen Gresik (referred as “Cemex Gresik” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of P.T. Semen Gresik Case Study

On July 6, 1998, the Indonesian government announced that Cementos de Mexico (Cemex) was the preferred bidder for the largest government-owned cement company in Indonesia PT Semen Gresik. The first round of bidding had pitted Cemex against Holderbank of Switzerland and Heidelberger of Germany, two of the largest cement manufacturing firms in the world, and a mere seven weeks had passed since the resignation of President Suharto, a turning point for Indonesia's political and economic future. Cemex was informed on August 20 that their first round bid would have to be restructured, the primary change being a maximum of 14% of ownership passing from the government to Cemex. Then, as preferred bidders, Cemex would wait for the other round bidders to submit second bids. If their second bids were superior to Cemex's first bid, Cemex would have the right to match them if it wished. The vice president for finance of Cemex, Hector Midina, and his acquisition staff and consultants, now had only a few weeks to finalize their position

Case Authors : Michael Moffett

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : International business, Risk management

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for P.T. Semen Gresik Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012584)	-10012584	-	-
Year 1	3446845	-6565739	3446845	0.9434	3251741
Year 2	3977502	-2588237	7424347	0.89	3539963
Year 3	3939337	1351100	11363684	0.8396	3307543
Year 4	3243983	4595083	14607667	0.7921	2569538
TOTAL			14607667		12668785

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2656201

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cemex Gresik shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cemex Gresik have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of P.T. Semen Gresik

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cemex Gresik often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cemex Gresik needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012584)	-10012584	-	-
Year 1	3446845	-6565739	3446845	0.8696	2997257
Year 2	3977502	-2588237	7424347	0.7561	3007563
Year 3	3939337	1351100	11363684	0.6575	2590178
Year 4	3243983	4595083	14607667	0.5718	1854758
TOTAL					10449755

The Net NPV after 4 years is 437171

(10449755 - 10012584 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012584)	-10012584	-	-
Year 1	3446845	-6565739	3446845	0.8333	2872371
Year 2	3977502	-2588237	7424347	0.6944	2762154
Year 3	3939337	1351100	11363684	0.5787	2279709
Year 4	3243983	4595083	14607667	0.4823	1564421
TOTAL					9478655

The Net NPV after 4 years is -533929

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9478655 - 10012584 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cemex Gresik to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cemex Gresik has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cemex Gresik can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cemex Gresik, then the stock price of the Cemex Gresik should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cemex Gresik should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of P.T. Semen Gresik

References & Further Readings

Michael Moffett (2018), "P.T. Semen Gresik Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.