×




Cutting Costs in Financial Hard Times: Two Massachusetts Towns Consider a Police Merger Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Cutting Costs in Financial Hard Times: Two Massachusetts Towns Consider a Police Merger case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Cutting Costs in Financial Hard Times: Two Massachusetts Towns Consider a Police Merger case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by David King, Pamela Varley. The Cutting Costs in Financial Hard Times: Two Massachusetts Towns Consider a Police Merger (referred as “Towns Police” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Government, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Cutting Costs in Financial Hard Times: Two Massachusetts Towns Consider a Police Merger Case Study


When local governments face budget pressures, one approach is to regionalize services-that is, to seek out greater economies of scale by consolidating service delivery with other municipalities. This case describes the effort of two small (though well-heeled) Massachusetts towns to explore a police merger during the financial recession of 2009. The towns of Hamilton and Wenham, located north of Boston in the "North Shore" area, had, in the past, successfully consolidated school systems, libraries, recreation departments, and more. By some calculations, the towns stood to save a significant amount of money by merging police forces. Ultimately, however, they decided against it. The case includes partly conflicting data from several studies that estimate the financial impact of a police merger. Case number 1988.0


Case Authors : David King, Pamela Varley

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Government, Mergers & acquisitions




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Cutting Costs in Financial Hard Times: Two Massachusetts Towns Consider a Police Merger Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029983) -10029983 - -
Year 1 3471833 -6558150 3471833 0.9434 3275314
Year 2 3957723 -2600427 7429556 0.89 3522359
Year 3 3968800 1368373 11398356 0.8396 3332281
Year 4 3248896 4617269 14647252 0.7921 2573430
TOTAL 14647252 12703384




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2673401

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Towns Police have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Towns Police shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Cutting Costs in Financial Hard Times: Two Massachusetts Towns Consider a Police Merger

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Towns Police often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Towns Police needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029983) -10029983 - -
Year 1 3471833 -6558150 3471833 0.8696 3018985
Year 2 3957723 -2600427 7429556 0.7561 2992607
Year 3 3968800 1368373 11398356 0.6575 2609550
Year 4 3248896 4617269 14647252 0.5718 1857567
TOTAL 10478710


The Net NPV after 4 years is 448727

(10478710 - 10029983 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029983) -10029983 - -
Year 1 3471833 -6558150 3471833 0.8333 2893194
Year 2 3957723 -2600427 7429556 0.6944 2748419
Year 3 3968800 1368373 11398356 0.5787 2296759
Year 4 3248896 4617269 14647252 0.4823 1566790
TOTAL 9505162


The Net NPV after 4 years is -524821

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9505162 - 10029983 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Towns Police to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Towns Police has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Towns Police can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Towns Police, then the stock price of the Towns Police should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Towns Police should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Cutting Costs in Financial Hard Times: Two Massachusetts Towns Consider a Police Merger

References & Further Readings

David King, Pamela Varley (2018), "Cutting Costs in Financial Hard Times: Two Massachusetts Towns Consider a Police Merger Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Victoria Insurance Tbk PT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Farmax India Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Ichikawa Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


New Ray Medicine Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Gas Ships SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


Temp Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Eastern Silk Industries Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Direct Capita SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Smiths Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Myanmar Metals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


AdvanSix SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber