×




Shenzhen Filtroil: Finding Balance Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Shenzhen Filtroil: Finding Balance case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Shenzhen Filtroil: Finding Balance case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Lynn Isabella, Gerry Yemen. The Shenzhen Filtroil: Finding Balance (referred as “Filtroil Leahman” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Conflict, Cross-cultural management, Difficult conversations, Leadership.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Shenzhen Filtroil: Finding Balance Case Study


Jeremy Leahman, president of Filtroil, Inc., and Albert Randolph, founder of the firm, had partnered with a supplier in China to ramp up the manufacture of their China-based filtration system and start a new zinc alloy venture. They opened a new factory in Dongwan that was a merger between Shenzhen Filtroil and their supplier, Liu Li-whose own factory was on the verge of bankruptcy. Liu would own 10% of the merged factory and Shenzhen Filtroil would own the rest and acquire all of the necessary equipment. The two businesses filter and zinc would operate under the same roof. One year later Leahman was on a plane headed for China to hash out problems with Liu, who had demanded a monthly raise for himself and his wife, a new company car, and an increase in profit sharing. He had also threatened to delay product shipment to the United States if his conditions were left unmet. Qian Kai Nam (Qian) and Shea Kai Young (Thomas), who ran Shenzhen Filtroil and were in on the zinc partnership, believed that Liu's behavior put the entire business relationship at risk. The case reveals options Leahman could take to manage the situation. The case is suitable for use in organizational behavior, human resource management, and strategy classes at the MBA and executive education levels. The material can be used to exemplify the challenges of changing a U.S.-based company into a global competitor.


Case Authors : Lynn Isabella, Gerry Yemen

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Conflict, Cross-cultural management, Difficult conversations, Leadership




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Shenzhen Filtroil: Finding Balance Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006286) -10006286 - -
Year 1 3465953 -6540333 3465953 0.9434 3269767
Year 2 3978124 -2562209 7444077 0.89 3540516
Year 3 3941963 1379754 11386040 0.8396 3309748
Year 4 3247990 4627744 14634030 0.7921 2572712
TOTAL 14634030 12692744




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2686458

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Filtroil Leahman shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Filtroil Leahman have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Shenzhen Filtroil: Finding Balance

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Filtroil Leahman often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Filtroil Leahman needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006286) -10006286 - -
Year 1 3465953 -6540333 3465953 0.8696 3013872
Year 2 3978124 -2562209 7444077 0.7561 3008033
Year 3 3941963 1379754 11386040 0.6575 2591905
Year 4 3247990 4627744 14634030 0.5718 1857049
TOTAL 10470859


The Net NPV after 4 years is 464573

(10470859 - 10006286 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006286) -10006286 - -
Year 1 3465953 -6540333 3465953 0.8333 2888294
Year 2 3978124 -2562209 7444077 0.6944 2762586
Year 3 3941963 1379754 11386040 0.5787 2281229
Year 4 3247990 4627744 14634030 0.4823 1566353
TOTAL 9498462


The Net NPV after 4 years is -507824

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498462 - 10006286 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Filtroil Leahman to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Filtroil Leahman has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Filtroil Leahman can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Filtroil Leahman, then the stock price of the Filtroil Leahman should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Filtroil Leahman should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Shenzhen Filtroil: Finding Balance

References & Further Readings

Lynn Isabella, Gerry Yemen (2018), "Shenzhen Filtroil: Finding Balance Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Arad SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Immofinanz SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Beijing Hanjian Heshan Pipeline SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


RBS PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Komeri Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Home Improvement)


First Brothers SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Ice Make SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Allied Digital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Royale Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Iron Road SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


WTK SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Forestry & Wood Products


Hengda Hi Tech A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing