×




Ownership Structure and the Diversification and Performance of Publicly-Listed Companies in China Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Ownership Structure and the Diversification and Performance of Publicly-Listed Companies in China case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Ownership Structure and the Diversification and Performance of Publicly-Listed Companies in China case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Andrew Delios, Nan Zhou, Wei Wei Xu. The Ownership Structure and the Diversification and Performance of Publicly-Listed Companies in China (referred as “Ownership Diversification” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Ownership Structure and the Diversification and Performance of Publicly-Listed Companies in China Case Study


The growth and heightened competitiveness of listed companies in China share several central features. These include the gradual transition of state-owned assets to private investors, a rapid pace of product diversification, and impending rapid growth into international markets. In this article, we focus on measuring and identifying the implications of the ownership structure and diversification strategy of listed companies in China. We highlight recent developments in the ownership transition of China's companies, and point to an ownership classification system that can better identify and address differences in the motivations, strategies, and performance of these companies.


Case Authors : Andrew Delios, Nan Zhou, Wei Wei Xu

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Ownership Structure and the Diversification and Performance of Publicly-Listed Companies in China Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025013) -10025013 - -
Year 1 3455531 -6569482 3455531 0.9434 3259935
Year 2 3971997 -2597485 7427528 0.89 3535063
Year 3 3966464 1368979 11393992 0.8396 3330320
Year 4 3224258 4593237 14618250 0.7921 2553914
TOTAL 14618250 12679232




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2654219

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Ownership Diversification shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Ownership Diversification have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Ownership Structure and the Diversification and Performance of Publicly-Listed Companies in China

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Ownership Diversification often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Ownership Diversification needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025013) -10025013 - -
Year 1 3455531 -6569482 3455531 0.8696 3004810
Year 2 3971997 -2597485 7427528 0.7561 3003400
Year 3 3966464 1368979 11393992 0.6575 2608014
Year 4 3224258 4593237 14618250 0.5718 1843480
TOTAL 10459704


The Net NPV after 4 years is 434691

(10459704 - 10025013 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025013) -10025013 - -
Year 1 3455531 -6569482 3455531 0.8333 2879609
Year 2 3971997 -2597485 7427528 0.6944 2758331
Year 3 3966464 1368979 11393992 0.5787 2295407
Year 4 3224258 4593237 14618250 0.4823 1554908
TOTAL 9488256


The Net NPV after 4 years is -536757

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488256 - 10025013 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Ownership Diversification to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Ownership Diversification has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Ownership Diversification can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Ownership Diversification, then the stock price of the Ownership Diversification should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Ownership Diversification should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Ownership Structure and the Diversification and Performance of Publicly-Listed Companies in China

References & Further Readings

Andrew Delios, Nan Zhou, Wei Wei Xu (2018), "Ownership Structure and the Diversification and Performance of Publicly-Listed Companies in China Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


LUPATECH ON SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Cohen Steers SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Yonghyun BM SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Pharmacyte Biotech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Leigh Creek Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Cancom SE SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Cegereal SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Airtech Japan Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Space Value SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services