The Battle of the Asian Transshipment Hubs: PSA versus PTP (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Battle of the Asian Transshipment Hubs: PSA versus PTP (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Battle of the Asian Transshipment Hubs: PSA versus PTP (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ming-Jer Chen, Jin Leong. The The Battle of the Asian Transshipment Hubs: PSA versus PTP (A) (referred as “Port Ptp” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Decision making, Emerging markets, Globalization, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of The Battle of the Asian Transshipment Hubs: PSA versus PTP (A) Case Study

This case from a three-case series that includes S-0110 and S-0111 explores competitive strategies in a mature industry within the context of the Asia-Pacific region and is appropriate for use in competitive dynamics, international business, or business strategy courses. The state-owned Port of Singapore Authority wanted to become the World's Port of Call. The port of Singapore was one the world's busiest and a model of efficiency and operational excellence. But, by the end of 2001, it had lost two key customers to an emerging competitor, the port of Tanjung Pelepas (PTP), in neighboring Malaysia. In 2002, the Chinese shipper COSCO Pacific was considering a shift to PTP. By 2003, the port of Singapore had laid off staff and tried to explain the reasons behind the layoffs.

Case Authors : Ming-Jer Chen, Jin Leong

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Decision making, Emerging markets, Globalization, Strategic planning

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Battle of the Asian Transshipment Hubs: PSA versus PTP (A) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10011948)	-10011948	-	-
Year 1	3455880	-6556068	3455880	0.9434	3260264
Year 2	3957721	-2598347	7413601	0.89	3522358
Year 3	3975349	1377002	11388950	0.8396	3337780
Year 4	3244661	4621663	14633611	0.7921	2570075
TOTAL			14633611		12690477

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2678529

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Port Ptp shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Port Ptp have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Battle of the Asian Transshipment Hubs: PSA versus PTP (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Port Ptp often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Port Ptp needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10011948)	-10011948	-	-
Year 1	3455880	-6556068	3455880	0.8696	3005113
Year 2	3957721	-2598347	7413601	0.7561	2992606
Year 3	3975349	1377002	11388950	0.6575	2613856
Year 4	3244661	4621663	14633611	0.5718	1855145
TOTAL					10466721

The Net NPV after 4 years is 454773

(10466721 - 10011948 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10011948)	-10011948	-	-
Year 1	3455880	-6556068	3455880	0.8333	2879900
Year 2	3957721	-2598347	7413601	0.6944	2748417
Year 3	3975349	1377002	11388950	0.5787	2300549
Year 4	3244661	4621663	14633611	0.4823	1564748
TOTAL					9493614

The Net NPV after 4 years is -518334

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9493614 - 10011948 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Port Ptp to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Port Ptp has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Port Ptp can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Port Ptp, then the stock price of the Port Ptp should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Port Ptp should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of The Battle of the Asian Transshipment Hubs: PSA versus PTP (A)

References & Further Readings

Ming-Jer Chen, Jin Leong (2018), "The Battle of the Asian Transshipment Hubs: PSA versus PTP (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.