×




Competing Through Joint Innovation Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Competing Through Joint Innovation case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Competing Through Joint Innovation case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Manuel Hensmans. The Competing Through Joint Innovation (referred as “Innovation Huawei” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Innovation, Joint ventures.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Competing Through Joint Innovation Case Study


This is an MIT Sloan Management Review Article. Emerging markets such as China and India have become the growth drivers of corporate research and development initiatives from all around the world. Although there is growing evidence that Chinese companies are shifting their innovation focus from cost saving to knowledge-based research, the view by many in the West remains that companies based in emerging markets are not ready to take over the role of leading innovators from their Western competitors. As a result, Chinese multinationals have been at a competitive disadvantage, particularly in strategic technology industries. What can Chinese multinationals do to overcome Western barriers to entry in strategically important technology industries in which "Made in China" or "Designed in China" are viewed as negatives? What dynamic innovation capabilities - or, put another way, what culturally specific processes - should companies focus on to gain acceptance in the competitive global marketplace? To answer these questions, the author studied Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., the Chinese telecommunications company that has recently made significant inroads in Europe's mature and strategically important telecommunications industry, making it a potential role model for companies in China and other parts of Asia hoping to make a similar transition. In Europe, the author notes, Huawei has typically relied on the same strategy it used to build its market position in China. It has (1) offered customized technologies that meet the practical needs and resource constraints of target customers; (2) built customer loyalty by enhancing practical innovation with longer-term joint innovation partnerships; and (3) enlisted the support of governments, universities, and other industry stakeholders by customizing further innovation investments to their priorities.


Case Authors : Manuel Hensmans

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Innovation, Joint ventures




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Competing Through Joint Innovation Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027764) -10027764 - -
Year 1 3466409 -6561355 3466409 0.9434 3270197
Year 2 3953506 -2607849 7419915 0.89 3518606
Year 3 3972403 1364554 11392318 0.8396 3335306
Year 4 3228100 4592654 14620418 0.7921 2556958
TOTAL 14620418 12681067




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2653303

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Innovation Huawei have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Innovation Huawei shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Competing Through Joint Innovation

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Innovation Huawei often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Innovation Huawei needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027764) -10027764 - -
Year 1 3466409 -6561355 3466409 0.8696 3014269
Year 2 3953506 -2607849 7419915 0.7561 2989419
Year 3 3972403 1364554 11392318 0.6575 2611919
Year 4 3228100 4592654 14620418 0.5718 1845677
TOTAL 10461283


The Net NPV after 4 years is 433519

(10461283 - 10027764 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027764) -10027764 - -
Year 1 3466409 -6561355 3466409 0.8333 2888674
Year 2 3953506 -2607849 7419915 0.6944 2745490
Year 3 3972403 1364554 11392318 0.5787 2298844
Year 4 3228100 4592654 14620418 0.4823 1556761
TOTAL 9489770


The Net NPV after 4 years is -537994

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489770 - 10027764 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Innovation Huawei to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Innovation Huawei has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Innovation Huawei can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Innovation Huawei, then the stock price of the Innovation Huawei should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Innovation Huawei should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Competing Through Joint Innovation

References & Further Readings

Manuel Hensmans (2018), "Competing Through Joint Innovation Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Shikoku Chemicals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


IAG Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Dainichiseika Color Chemical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Molson Coors Brewing B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Medtech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Somi Conveyor Beltings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


BLX SA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Matsuoka SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Getein Biotech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Canare Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Xinjiang Sailing SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services