×




Warburg Pincus and emgs: The IPO Decision (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Warburg Pincus and emgs: The IPO Decision (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Warburg Pincus and emgs: The IPO Decision (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by G. Felda Hardymon, Ann Leamon. The Warburg Pincus and emgs: The IPO Decision (A) (referred as “Emgs Warburg” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Financial markets, Globalization, IPO.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Warburg Pincus and emgs: The IPO Decision (A) Case Study


Two partners of Warburg Pincus, a global private equity firm, are trying to decide whether to take a portfolio company public, and on what exchange. The company, Norway-based ElectroMagnetic GeoServices (emgs), has developed a market-leading technology that determines whether an undersea rock formation contains oil -- prior to the oil company drilling a hole. With its high-growth characteristics, emgs is very different from the typical oilfield services company, and would be more suitable for floating on the NYSE or LSE, where liquidity and valuations would also be greater than on the Oslo Bors, the other possibility. Yet floating in the U.S. would involve greater compliance expense and might also require the management team to move to New York or Houston, something the team is reluctant to do. The partners need to decide what to do before the IPO window for energy-related companies closes.


Case Authors : G. Felda Hardymon, Ann Leamon

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, Financial markets, Globalization, IPO




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Warburg Pincus and emgs: The IPO Decision (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027682) -10027682 - -
Year 1 3454604 -6573078 3454604 0.9434 3259060
Year 2 3980258 -2592820 7434862 0.89 3542415
Year 3 3942164 1349344 11377026 0.8396 3309917
Year 4 3248205 4597549 14625231 0.7921 2572883
TOTAL 14625231 12684275




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2656593

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Emgs Warburg have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Emgs Warburg shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Warburg Pincus and emgs: The IPO Decision (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Emgs Warburg often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Emgs Warburg needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027682) -10027682 - -
Year 1 3454604 -6573078 3454604 0.8696 3004003
Year 2 3980258 -2592820 7434862 0.7561 3009647
Year 3 3942164 1349344 11377026 0.6575 2592037
Year 4 3248205 4597549 14625231 0.5718 1857172
TOTAL 10462859


The Net NPV after 4 years is 435177

(10462859 - 10027682 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027682) -10027682 - -
Year 1 3454604 -6573078 3454604 0.8333 2878837
Year 2 3980258 -2592820 7434862 0.6944 2764068
Year 3 3942164 1349344 11377026 0.5787 2281345
Year 4 3248205 4597549 14625231 0.4823 1566457
TOTAL 9490707


The Net NPV after 4 years is -536975

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9490707 - 10027682 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Emgs Warburg to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Emgs Warburg has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Emgs Warburg can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Emgs Warburg, then the stock price of the Emgs Warburg should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Emgs Warburg should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Warburg Pincus and emgs: The IPO Decision (A)

References & Further Readings

G. Felda Hardymon, Ann Leamon (2018), "Warburg Pincus and emgs: The IPO Decision (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Chong Hing Bank SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Money Center Banks


Terna SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


FAWER Automotive SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


IXICO SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Osmotica Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Canny Elevator A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Bonei Hatichon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Gulf Coast SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Soupman SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing