×




World Vision International's AIDS Initiative: Challenging a Global Partnership Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for World Vision International's AIDS Initiative: Challenging a Global Partnership case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. World Vision International's AIDS Initiative: Challenging a Global Partnership case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Christopher A. Bartlett, Daniel F. Curran. The World Vision International's AIDS Initiative: Challenging a Global Partnership (referred as “Vision's Aids” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Cross-cultural management, Globalization, Health, Joint ventures, Organizational structure, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of World Vision International's AIDS Initiative: Challenging a Global Partnership Case Study


After 25 years of building a network of interdependent, national organizations delivering relief and development that are responsive to local needs, World Vision's International office is planning to implement a major global HIV/AIDS initiative that challenges the strategic direction, organizational capabilities, and even underlying values of its carefully constructed world partnership. Not only does the new AIDS initiative require much more central direction than is customary in this global partnership of World Vision organizations, each with its own independent board of directors, but it also is acknowledged to have little support among World Vision's donor base and even its internal organization. Involves a trigger decision about whether and how to proceed.


Case Authors : Christopher A. Bartlett, Daniel F. Curran

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Cross-cultural management, Globalization, Health, Joint ventures, Organizational structure, Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for World Vision International's AIDS Initiative: Challenging a Global Partnership Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008299) -10008299 - -
Year 1 3451893 -6556406 3451893 0.9434 3256503
Year 2 3977040 -2579366 7428933 0.89 3539551
Year 3 3943007 1363641 11371940 0.8396 3310625
Year 4 3249119 4612760 14621059 0.7921 2573607
TOTAL 14621059 12680286




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2671987

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Vision's Aids shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Vision's Aids have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of World Vision International's AIDS Initiative: Challenging a Global Partnership

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Vision's Aids often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Vision's Aids needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008299) -10008299 - -
Year 1 3451893 -6556406 3451893 0.8696 3001646
Year 2 3977040 -2579366 7428933 0.7561 3007214
Year 3 3943007 1363641 11371940 0.6575 2592591
Year 4 3249119 4612760 14621059 0.5718 1857694
TOTAL 10459145


The Net NPV after 4 years is 450846

(10459145 - 10008299 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008299) -10008299 - -
Year 1 3451893 -6556406 3451893 0.8333 2876578
Year 2 3977040 -2579366 7428933 0.6944 2761833
Year 3 3943007 1363641 11371940 0.5787 2281833
Year 4 3249119 4612760 14621059 0.4823 1566898
TOTAL 9487141


The Net NPV after 4 years is -521158

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487141 - 10008299 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Vision's Aids to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Vision's Aids has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Vision's Aids can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Vision's Aids, then the stock price of the Vision's Aids should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Vision's Aids should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of World Vision International's AIDS Initiative: Challenging a Global Partnership

References & Further Readings

Christopher A. Bartlett, Daniel F. Curran (2018), "World Vision International's AIDS Initiative: Challenging a Global Partnership Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Brightrock Gold Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Primerica SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Life)


Fuso Dentsu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Ebiquity SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Allan Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Xi An Haitian Antenna SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Lida Optical A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


B Yair Building SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services