×




Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based Strategy Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based Strategy case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based Strategy case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Stephen Tallman, Karin Fladmoe Lindquist, Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist. The Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based Strategy (referred as “Multinational Capability” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Globalization.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based Strategy Case Study


Current trends appear to suggest that globally integrated strategies are the wave of the future for many industries, but no theoretically sound, firm-level model explains this situation. International business models explain industry trends from economic perspectives, and organizational theory is beginning to examine the organizing principles of multinational firms. However, a gap exists in explaining the strategic motivations of multinational firms as they expand and integrate worldwide. This article develops a capability-driven, as opposed to market-driven, framework of multinational strategy. This contingent framework explains the organizational consequences of international expansion and global integration depending on the capability types, capability strategies, and multinational strategies of the multinational firm.


Case Authors : Stephen Tallman, Karin Fladmoe Lindquist, Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Globalization




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based Strategy Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018710) -10018710 - -
Year 1 3445554 -6573156 3445554 0.9434 3250523
Year 2 3953925 -2619231 7399479 0.89 3518979
Year 3 3975318 1356087 11374797 0.8396 3337754
Year 4 3225746 4581833 14600543 0.7921 2555093
TOTAL 14600543 12662348




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2643638

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Multinational Capability have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Multinational Capability shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based Strategy

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Global Business Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Multinational Capability often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Multinational Capability needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018710) -10018710 - -
Year 1 3445554 -6573156 3445554 0.8696 2996134
Year 2 3953925 -2619231 7399479 0.7561 2989735
Year 3 3975318 1356087 11374797 0.6575 2613836
Year 4 3225746 4581833 14600543 0.5718 1844331
TOTAL 10444036


The Net NPV after 4 years is 425326

(10444036 - 10018710 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018710) -10018710 - -
Year 1 3445554 -6573156 3445554 0.8333 2871295
Year 2 3953925 -2619231 7399479 0.6944 2745781
Year 3 3975318 1356087 11374797 0.5787 2300531
Year 4 3225746 4581833 14600543 0.4823 1555626
TOTAL 9473233


The Net NPV after 4 years is -545477

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9473233 - 10018710 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Multinational Capability to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Multinational Capability has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Multinational Capability can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Multinational Capability, then the stock price of the Multinational Capability should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Multinational Capability should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based Strategy

References & Further Readings

Stephen Tallman, Karin Fladmoe Lindquist, Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist (2018), "Internationalization, Globalization, and Capability-Based Strategy Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


eSun SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Motion Pictures


Takara Standard SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Cedar SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Credit Acceptance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


West China Cement SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Alliance Mineral SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Beijing Capital Retailing SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Department & Discount)


Cosern SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Capital World SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services