×




Zeal: Launching Personalized and Social Learning Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Zeal: Launching Personalized and Social Learning case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Zeal: Launching Personalized and Social Learning case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John J-H Kim, Christine An. The Zeal: Launching Personalized and Social Learning (referred as “Zeal Danner” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Product development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Zeal: Launching Personalized and Social Learning Case Study


"Set in 2014, this case follows John Danner and his team at Zeal as they consider their product development strategy. In February 2013, serial entrepreneurs John Danner and Sanjay Noronha co-found Zeal, an education technology start up providing a web-based, mobile learning platform that helps students from Kindergarten to 8th grade build math and literacy skills based on Common Core State Standards through personalized learning plans. Having been a teacher and founder of a successful network of charter schools, Danner believes learning does not have to be limited to the classroom and wants to create a product that can connect students, parents, and teachers to facilitate individual student learning. Furthermore, he believes that offering a social, personalized learning tool can offer a fun way for students to learn and can also save time for teachers who want to provide differentiated instruction. Based out of the offices of the NewSchools Venture Fund in Palo Alto, Danner and Noronha work to rapidly develop the product with their founding team and their teacher partners at Rocketship Education, a K-5 charter school organization providing blended instruction combining technology and traditional methods. After several iterations, the Zeal team launches the latest version of Zeal in Fall 2014. While reflecting on their process to find product-market fit, Danner and his team wonder where to pivot next and seek an appropriate business model that considers their customer and user base. The case describes the student, parent, and teacher features offered by the evolving Zeal product, and how the team begins with a focus on personalized, peer-to-peer learning and, based on feedback, refines the product to add in-class features and create a teacher product. Students will have the opportunity to explore how an early SaaS start-up in the educational technology space can approach early product development, pilot in classrooms, and connect with different stakeholders."


Case Authors : John J-H Kim, Christine An

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Product development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Zeal: Launching Personalized and Social Learning Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027669) -10027669 - -
Year 1 3446897 -6580772 3446897 0.9434 3251790
Year 2 3971303 -2609469 7418200 0.89 3534446
Year 3 3965579 1356110 11383779 0.8396 3329577
Year 4 3247949 4604059 14631728 0.7921 2572680
TOTAL 14631728 12688492




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2660823

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Zeal Danner shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Zeal Danner have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Zeal: Launching Personalized and Social Learning

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Zeal Danner often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Zeal Danner needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027669) -10027669 - -
Year 1 3446897 -6580772 3446897 0.8696 2997302
Year 2 3971303 -2609469 7418200 0.7561 3002876
Year 3 3965579 1356110 11383779 0.6575 2607433
Year 4 3247949 4604059 14631728 0.5718 1857025
TOTAL 10464635


The Net NPV after 4 years is 436966

(10464635 - 10027669 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027669) -10027669 - -
Year 1 3446897 -6580772 3446897 0.8333 2872414
Year 2 3971303 -2609469 7418200 0.6944 2757849
Year 3 3965579 1356110 11383779 0.5787 2294895
Year 4 3247949 4604059 14631728 0.4823 1566333
TOTAL 9491492


The Net NPV after 4 years is -536177

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9491492 - 10027669 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Zeal Danner to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Zeal Danner has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Zeal Danner can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Zeal Danner, then the stock price of the Zeal Danner should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Zeal Danner should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Zeal: Launching Personalized and Social Learning

References & Further Readings

John J-H Kim, Christine An (2018), "Zeal: Launching Personalized and Social Learning Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Ackermans SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Benguet B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Hansa SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


DnB SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Lai Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Snow Peak SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Plumas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


CoreSite SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations