×




Nomis Solutions (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Nomis Solutions (B) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Nomis Solutions (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Omar Besbes, Daizhuo Chen, Robert L. Phillips. The Nomis Solutions (B) (referred as “Nomis Solutions” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial analysis, Operations.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Nomis Solutions (B) Case Study


Simon Caufield and Bob Phillips had just put the finishing touches on the business plan for Nomis Solutions, a start-up company that planned to offer price-optimization solutions to financial service firms. Nomis aimed to use advanced analytic techniques to help its clients to set prices for consumer loans and deposits. Was there a market for the products and services that Nomis planned to offer? If so, how large was the market? What would persuade potential clients that Nomis's product and services would add value?


Case Authors : Omar Besbes, Daizhuo Chen, Robert L. Phillips

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Financial analysis, Operations




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Nomis Solutions (B) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016462) -10016462 - -
Year 1 3453257 -6563205 3453257 0.9434 3257790
Year 2 3959743 -2603462 7413000 0.89 3524157
Year 3 3936017 1332555 11349017 0.8396 3304756
Year 4 3246262 4578817 14595279 0.7921 2571344
TOTAL 14595279 12658046




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2641584

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Nomis Solutions shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Nomis Solutions have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Nomis Solutions (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Nomis Solutions often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Nomis Solutions needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016462) -10016462 - -
Year 1 3453257 -6563205 3453257 0.8696 3002832
Year 2 3959743 -2603462 7413000 0.7561 2994135
Year 3 3936017 1332555 11349017 0.6575 2587995
Year 4 3246262 4578817 14595279 0.5718 1856061
TOTAL 10441023


The Net NPV after 4 years is 424561

(10441023 - 10016462 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016462) -10016462 - -
Year 1 3453257 -6563205 3453257 0.8333 2877714
Year 2 3959743 -2603462 7413000 0.6944 2749822
Year 3 3936017 1332555 11349017 0.5787 2277788
Year 4 3246262 4578817 14595279 0.4823 1565520
TOTAL 9470843


The Net NPV after 4 years is -545619

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9470843 - 10016462 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Nomis Solutions to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Nomis Solutions has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Nomis Solutions can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Nomis Solutions, then the stock price of the Nomis Solutions should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Nomis Solutions should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Nomis Solutions (B)

References & Further Readings

Omar Besbes, Daizhuo Chen, Robert L. Phillips (2018), "Nomis Solutions (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Heineken NV SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Michaels SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Corvus Gold Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


iFabric Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Anglo Pacific SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Intermap Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.