×




Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Henry Chesbrough, Sohyeong Kim, Alice Agogino. The Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem (referred as “Panisse Chez” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy, Innovation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem Case Study


The case study provides a history of Chez Panisse and Alice Waters. Throughout Chez Panisse' s history, Waters and her team had built a local and now global ecosystem using an "open innovation" strategy with stakeholders such as suppliers, alumni chef and staff, food writers, and others. The Chez Panisse ecosystem case study uses an open innovation framework to analyze how Chez Panisse grew. The case study examines how a small firm thrived and became a business success based on building a successful business ecosystem that shares knowledge, encourages individuals' growth, and embeds trust among participants.


Case Authors : Henry Chesbrough, Sohyeong Kim, Alice Agogino

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Growth strategy, Innovation




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018403) -10018403 - -
Year 1 3470265 -6548138 3470265 0.9434 3273835
Year 2 3969337 -2578801 7439602 0.89 3532696
Year 3 3947028 1368227 11386630 0.8396 3314001
Year 4 3240346 4608573 14626976 0.7921 2566658
TOTAL 14626976 12687189




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2668786

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Panisse Chez have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Panisse Chez shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Panisse Chez often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Panisse Chez needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018403) -10018403 - -
Year 1 3470265 -6548138 3470265 0.8696 3017622
Year 2 3969337 -2578801 7439602 0.7561 3001389
Year 3 3947028 1368227 11386630 0.6575 2595235
Year 4 3240346 4608573 14626976 0.5718 1852678
TOTAL 10466924


The Net NPV after 4 years is 448521

(10466924 - 10018403 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018403) -10018403 - -
Year 1 3470265 -6548138 3470265 0.8333 2891888
Year 2 3969337 -2578801 7439602 0.6944 2756484
Year 3 3947028 1368227 11386630 0.5787 2284160
Year 4 3240346 4608573 14626976 0.4823 1562667
TOTAL 9495198


The Net NPV after 4 years is -523205

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9495198 - 10018403 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Panisse Chez to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Panisse Chez has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Panisse Chez can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Panisse Chez, then the stock price of the Panisse Chez should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Panisse Chez should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem

References & Further Readings

Henry Chesbrough, Sohyeong Kim, Alice Agogino (2018), "Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Carbo Ceramics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Yuyue Medical A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Itochu Corp. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Adslot SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


KMW SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


BanBao SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Sajo Seafood SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


MGIC Investment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


China Titans Energy Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Intercede SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming