A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: fopen(/var/lib/php/sessions/ci_session8fo8imarjujl9ks7mrqqeeshpk34t9kb): failed to open stream: No space left on device

Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php

Line Number: 174


File: /var/www/oakspringuniversity.com/public_html/application/controllers/Frontpage.php
Line: 9
Function: __construct

File: /var/www/oakspringuniversity.com/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_start(): Failed to read session data: user (path: /var/lib/php/sessions)

Filename: Session/Session.php

Line Number: 143


File: /var/www/oakspringuniversity.com/public_html/application/controllers/Frontpage.php
Line: 9
Function: __construct

File: /var/www/oakspringuniversity.com/public_html/index.php
Line: 315
Function: require_once

NPV: Peter Jepsen Net Present Value Case Analysis

Peter Jepsen Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Peter Jepsen case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Peter Jepsen case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Howard H. Stevenson, Michael J. Roberts, James M. Sharpe. The Peter Jepsen (referred as “Jepsen Covenants” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Costs, Crisis management, Entrepreneurial finance, Entrepreneurial management, Ethics, Manufacturing, Mergers & acquisitions, Negotiations, Recession.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of Peter Jepsen Case Study

About to break bank covenants, Peter Jepsen has to deal with a contentious prior owner, improve profitability and staff appropriately all while maintaining credibility with his investors, in the furniture hardware company he has owned for less than a year.Peter Jepsen, a newly minted MBA, has bought a furniture hardware manufacturing business utilizing debt and investors equity that in a very short time is about to trigger bank covenants due to poor financial performance. The prior owner continues to be involved in the business, handling key customers and expecting a healthy earn-out and some favorable transaction closing adjustments and Jepsen considers the wisdom of having him involved. Further, he has discovered an illegal practice to avoid customs duties that has been going on for years and condoned by the owner. He has taken steps to bring on new hires and outsource to reduce costs, but the faltering economy is lowering his revenues. He has to decide how to manage his banking relationships, the caliber of staff he needs and react to the declining revenue while maintaining the confidence of his board.

Case Authors : Howard H. Stevenson, Michael J. Roberts, James M. Sharpe

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Costs, Crisis management, Entrepreneurial finance, Entrepreneurial management, Ethics, Manufacturing, Mergers & acquisitions, Negotiations, Recession

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Peter Jepsen Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004582) -10004582 - -
Year 1 3451660 -6552922 3451660 0.9434 3256283
Year 2 3971957 -2580965 7423617 0.89 3535028
Year 3 3970392 1389427 11394009 0.8396 3333618
Year 4 3232868 4622295 14626877 0.7921 2560734
TOTAL 14626877 12685663

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2681081

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Jepsen Covenants have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Jepsen Covenants shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Peter Jepsen

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Jepsen Covenants often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Jepsen Covenants needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004582) -10004582 - -
Year 1 3451660 -6552922 3451660 0.8696 3001443
Year 2 3971957 -2580965 7423617 0.7561 3003370
Year 3 3970392 1389427 11394009 0.6575 2610597
Year 4 3232868 4622295 14626877 0.5718 1848403
TOTAL 10463814

The Net NPV after 4 years is 459232

(10463814 - 10004582 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004582) -10004582 - -
Year 1 3451660 -6552922 3451660 0.8333 2876383
Year 2 3971957 -2580965 7423617 0.6944 2758303
Year 3 3970392 1389427 11394009 0.5787 2297681
Year 4 3232868 4622295 14626877 0.4823 1559061
TOTAL 9491428

The Net NPV after 4 years is -513154

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9491428 - 10004582 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Jepsen Covenants to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Jepsen Covenants has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Jepsen Covenants can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Jepsen Covenants, then the stock price of the Jepsen Covenants should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Jepsen Covenants should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

References & Further Readings

Howard H. Stevenson, Michael J. Roberts, James M. Sharpe (2018), "Peter Jepsen Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.