×




Unitus (A): Microfinance 2.0--Reinventing an Industry Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Unitus (A): Microfinance 2.0--Reinventing an Industry case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Unitus (A): Microfinance 2.0--Reinventing an Industry case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by James A. Phills. The Unitus (A): Microfinance 2.0--Reinventing an Industry (referred as “Microfinance Unitus” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business, Social enterprise.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Unitus (A): Microfinance 2.0--Reinventing an Industry Case Study


Established in the mid-1970s, microfinance provided tiny loans to poor families to help them start and/or expand small businesses. Thirty years later, the practice had helped more than 80 million people to lift themselves out of extreme poverty and grown into a global industry comprised of more than 3,000 microfinance institutions. Early pioneers of microfinance, such as Muhmmad Yunnus of Grameen Bank, had become celebrities of sorts, receiving scores of humanitarian awards, including the 2006 Nobel Peace Prize. Similarly, the microfinance movement itself had become so well known that it invited comments from mainstream cultural icons such as Bono, lead singer of the band U2, who said: "Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day. Give a women microcredit, she, her husband, her children, and her extended family will eat for a lifetime." Despite these accolades, Geoff Davis and Mike Murray believed that while microfinance was an important social innovation, it was dramatically underperforming relative to its potential because it had yet to achieve adequate scale. They pointed out less than 20% of the world's demand for microfinance was being met. Murray observed, "Usually, an industry that had those dynamics would have been closed down." Prompted by their vision of microfinance's potential, they founded Unitus, Inc., a nonprofit focused on accelerating the growth of the microfinance industry so that vastly larger numbers of people could gain access to the capital they needed to generate an income, raise their standard of living, and fulfill their basic needs. Explores dynamics in the microfinance industry, describes the Unitus business model, and sets up an important decision facing the company: whether to expand the amount of capital it can provide to its microfinance partners through the creation of a debt or equity fund.


Case Authors : James A. Phills

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : International business, Social enterprise




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Unitus (A): Microfinance 2.0--Reinventing an Industry Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009585) -10009585 - -
Year 1 3454761 -6554824 3454761 0.9434 3259208
Year 2 3971382 -2583442 7426143 0.89 3534516
Year 3 3942708 1359266 11368851 0.8396 3310374
Year 4 3244114 4603380 14612965 0.7921 2569642
TOTAL 14612965 12673740




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2664155

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Microfinance Unitus shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Microfinance Unitus have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Unitus (A): Microfinance 2.0--Reinventing an Industry

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Microfinance Unitus often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Microfinance Unitus needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009585) -10009585 - -
Year 1 3454761 -6554824 3454761 0.8696 3004140
Year 2 3971382 -2583442 7426143 0.7561 3002935
Year 3 3942708 1359266 11368851 0.6575 2592395
Year 4 3244114 4603380 14612965 0.5718 1854833
TOTAL 10454303


The Net NPV after 4 years is 444718

(10454303 - 10009585 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009585) -10009585 - -
Year 1 3454761 -6554824 3454761 0.8333 2878968
Year 2 3971382 -2583442 7426143 0.6944 2757904
Year 3 3942708 1359266 11368851 0.5787 2281660
Year 4 3244114 4603380 14612965 0.4823 1564484
TOTAL 9483015


The Net NPV after 4 years is -526570

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483015 - 10009585 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Microfinance Unitus to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Microfinance Unitus has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Microfinance Unitus can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Microfinance Unitus, then the stock price of the Microfinance Unitus should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Microfinance Unitus should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Unitus (A): Microfinance 2.0--Reinventing an Industry

References & Further Readings

James A. Phills (2018), "Unitus (A): Microfinance 2.0--Reinventing an Industry Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


AYER SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


JEP SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Epcylon Technologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Yunnan Chuangxin New Material SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


NeoPharm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


CoreCross SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Office Supplies


Jain Studios Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Broadcasting & Cable TV


Vicat SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials