×




Hines Goes to Rio Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Hines Goes to Rio case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Hines Goes to Rio case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Arthur I Segel. The Hines Goes to Rio (referred as “Hines Project” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Project management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Hines Goes to Rio Case Study


To maximize their effectiveness, color cases should be printed in color.The Torre Almirante office tower, Hines' newest project in Rio de Janeiro, was a 36-story, Class AA office tower with an adjoining 420-stall parking structure and a preserved 14-story historic facade. It was completely different from anything that had previously been built in the city. It was also the first time that a developer took the risk of publicly announcing to the Brazilian business community its intention and commitment to complete such a complex real estate project on schedule. It was an impressive and unprecedented enterprise, but at this stage, the project was enmeshed in some operational complications. Several project designs were not yet ready, and discussions among the different companies involved in the development had intensified in the past weeks. Robert A.M. Stern Architects, the New York-based design architect, was debating with Hines about issues ranging from the glass window specifications to the material for the gold leaf lobby ceiling. Pontual Arquitetura, the local production architect, was concerned about the fire protection system. In addition, Racional, the local general contractor, just pointed out a serious problem in the freight elevator shaft that could force Hines to modify substantial parts of the project and, consequently, trigger a new round of required approvals. Includes color exhibits.


Case Authors : Arthur I Segel

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Project management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Hines Goes to Rio Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027299) -10027299 - -
Year 1 3450817 -6576482 3450817 0.9434 3255488
Year 2 3971495 -2604987 7422312 0.89 3534616
Year 3 3939969 1334982 11362281 0.8396 3308074
Year 4 3239141 4574123 14601422 0.7921 2565703
TOTAL 14601422 12663881




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2636582

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Hines Project have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Hines Project shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Hines Goes to Rio

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Hines Project often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Hines Project needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027299) -10027299 - -
Year 1 3450817 -6576482 3450817 0.8696 3000710
Year 2 3971495 -2604987 7422312 0.7561 3003021
Year 3 3939969 1334982 11362281 0.6575 2590594
Year 4 3239141 4574123 14601422 0.5718 1851989
TOTAL 10446314


The Net NPV after 4 years is 419015

(10446314 - 10027299 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10027299) -10027299 - -
Year 1 3450817 -6576482 3450817 0.8333 2875681
Year 2 3971495 -2604987 7422312 0.6944 2757983
Year 3 3939969 1334982 11362281 0.5787 2280075
Year 4 3239141 4574123 14601422 0.4823 1562086
TOTAL 9475824


The Net NPV after 4 years is -551475

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9475824 - 10027299 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Hines Project to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Hines Project has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Hines Project can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Hines Project, then the stock price of the Hines Project should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Hines Project should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Hines Goes to Rio

References & Further Readings

Arthur I Segel (2018), "Hines Goes to Rio Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Taihei Machinery Works SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


Igarashi Motors India Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Coset Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Safestore SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Jinling Pharm A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


KL-Net SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Daikokuya SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Ochi Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures