×




Shady Trail Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Shady Trail case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Shady Trail case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Arthur I Segel. The Shady Trail (referred as “Shady Lunsford” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Financial analysis, Financial management, Marketing, Mergers & acquisitions, Operations management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Shady Trail Case Study


Holt Lunsford was intrigued by the packet of papers that lay in front of him. The papers comprised a brochure that Lonestar Bank had put together in an effort to sell the Shady Trail Distribution Center in Dallas, Texas. Shady Hill was a five-year-old, 120,000-square-foot distribution warehouse facility located on the west side of Dallas. Lonestar was asking $4 million for the property. It was September 2003 and the Dallas real estate market was plateauing and the capital markets were in disarray. Lunsford had convinced 11 friends to put up $100,000 each in addition to his own $100,000 to acquire one or two troubled properties. Lunsford decided to focus on warehouse properties due to their relatively small size, their strong historical performance, and his relevant experience. He wondered whether Shady Trail would make a good investment.


Case Authors : Arthur I Segel

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Financial analysis, Financial management, Marketing, Mergers & acquisitions, Operations management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Shady Trail Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013718) -10013718 - -
Year 1 3450965 -6562753 3450965 0.9434 3255627
Year 2 3956375 -2606378 7407340 0.89 3521160
Year 3 3972728 1366350 11380068 0.8396 3335579
Year 4 3246905 4613255 14626973 0.7921 2571853
TOTAL 14626973 12684219




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2670501

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Shady Lunsford shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Shady Lunsford have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Shady Trail

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Shady Lunsford often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Shady Lunsford needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013718) -10013718 - -
Year 1 3450965 -6562753 3450965 0.8696 3000839
Year 2 3956375 -2606378 7407340 0.7561 2991588
Year 3 3972728 1366350 11380068 0.6575 2612133
Year 4 3246905 4613255 14626973 0.5718 1856428
TOTAL 10460989


The Net NPV after 4 years is 447271

(10460989 - 10013718 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013718) -10013718 - -
Year 1 3450965 -6562753 3450965 0.8333 2875804
Year 2 3956375 -2606378 7407340 0.6944 2747483
Year 3 3972728 1366350 11380068 0.5787 2299032
Year 4 3246905 4613255 14626973 0.4823 1565830
TOTAL 9488149


The Net NPV after 4 years is -525569

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488149 - 10013718 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Shady Lunsford to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Shady Lunsford has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Shady Lunsford can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Shady Lunsford, then the stock price of the Shady Lunsford should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Shady Lunsford should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Shady Trail

References & Further Readings

Arthur I Segel (2018), "Shady Trail Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Analabs Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Fujitsu ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Spartan Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Paragon Union SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Eloxx Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Vardhman Textiles SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Kenko Mayonnaise SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Adidas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Footwear