Kaskazi Network Ltd - Distributing to the Bottom of the Pyramid (C) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Kaskazi Network Ltd - Distributing to the Bottom of the Pyramid (C) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Kaskazi Network Ltd - Distributing to the Bottom of the Pyramid (C) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Leif Sjoblom, Winifred Karugu, Lisa Schuepbach. The Kaskazi Network Ltd - Distributing to the Bottom of the Pyramid (C) (referred as “Kaskazi Dealing” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Kaskazi Network Ltd - Distributing to the Bottom of the Pyramid (C) Case Study

This is the third and last part of a case series dealing with the distribution of FMCG (Fast Moving Consumer Goods) to low income areas (slums) in Kenya. It describes the situation in July 2008. In spite of its success, KasKazi is mainly used for short term promotions by its clients. This creates dry spells and a void in the market when a contract comes to an end. And Wanjohi's appetite has grown - he is considering expanding into neighbouring countries such as Uganda and Tanzania, and creating and promoting his own products. Learning objectives: The case series would be suitable for a core marketing course (dealing with the market challenge, and distribution and retail issues in Africa), a course on supply chain (distribution issues in Africa), an entrepreneurship course (dealing with business growth strategies) or a general management course. In all these courses, the case series can be used to illustrate the challenge and complexity of reaching low income customers in developing countries.

Case Authors : Leif Sjoblom, Winifred Karugu, Lisa Schuepbach

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Marketing, Supply chain

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Kaskazi Network Ltd - Distributing to the Bottom of the Pyramid (C) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10013892)	-10013892	-	-
Year 1	3452342	-6561550	3452342	0.9434	3256926
Year 2	3962333	-2599217	7414675	0.89	3526462
Year 3	3956508	1357291	11371183	0.8396	3321960
Year 4	3225422	4582713	14596605	0.7921	2554836
TOTAL			14596605		12660185

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2646293

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Kaskazi Dealing have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Kaskazi Dealing shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Kaskazi Network Ltd - Distributing to the Bottom of the Pyramid (C)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Kaskazi Dealing often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Kaskazi Dealing needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10013892)	-10013892	-	-
Year 1	3452342	-6561550	3452342	0.8696	3002037
Year 2	3962333	-2599217	7414675	0.7561	2996093
Year 3	3956508	1357291	11371183	0.6575	2601468
Year 4	3225422	4582713	14596605	0.5718	1844145
TOTAL					10443743

The Net NPV after 4 years is 429851

(10443743 - 10013892 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10013892)	-10013892	-	-
Year 1	3452342	-6561550	3452342	0.8333	2876952
Year 2	3962333	-2599217	7414675	0.6944	2751620
Year 3	3956508	1357291	11371183	0.5787	2289646
Year 4	3225422	4582713	14596605	0.4823	1555470
TOTAL					9473687

The Net NPV after 4 years is -540205

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9473687 - 10013892 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Kaskazi Dealing to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Kaskazi Dealing has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Kaskazi Dealing can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Kaskazi Dealing, then the stock price of the Kaskazi Dealing should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Kaskazi Dealing should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Kaskazi Network Ltd - Distributing to the Bottom of the Pyramid (C)

References & Further Readings

Leif Sjoblom, Winifred Karugu, Lisa Schuepbach (2018), "Kaskazi Network Ltd - Distributing to the Bottom of the Pyramid (C) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.