×




OnLink Technologies: Growth Challenges Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for OnLink Technologies: Growth Challenges case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. OnLink Technologies: Growth Challenges case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Antonio Davila, Buaboocha Semapakdi. The OnLink Technologies: Growth Challenges (referred as “Onlink's Stage” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Performance measurement.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of OnLink Technologies: Growth Challenges Case Study


This case presents the various challenges that a start-up faces during its growth. Buck French, OnLink's CEO, has to decide how to move to the next stage, and this decision involves how to retrain or replace its sales and marketing people. The case describes OnLink's growth since the idea generation stage, through its founding, early growth, product development and marketing, its quest for funding, and the rapid growth stage. Throughout the evolution of the company, the management team faces different challenges that they resolve over time.


Case Authors : Antonio Davila, Buaboocha Semapakdi

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Performance measurement




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for OnLink Technologies: Growth Challenges Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019959) -10019959 - -
Year 1 3444402 -6575557 3444402 0.9434 3249436
Year 2 3972043 -2603514 7416445 0.89 3535104
Year 3 3952407 1348893 11368852 0.8396 3318517
Year 4 3233318 4582211 14602170 0.7921 2561091
TOTAL 14602170 12664148




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2644189

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Onlink's Stage have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Onlink's Stage shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of OnLink Technologies: Growth Challenges

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Onlink's Stage often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Onlink's Stage needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019959) -10019959 - -
Year 1 3444402 -6575557 3444402 0.8696 2995132
Year 2 3972043 -2603514 7416445 0.7561 3003435
Year 3 3952407 1348893 11368852 0.6575 2598772
Year 4 3233318 4582211 14602170 0.5718 1848660
TOTAL 10445999


The Net NPV after 4 years is 426040

(10445999 - 10019959 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019959) -10019959 - -
Year 1 3444402 -6575557 3444402 0.8333 2870335
Year 2 3972043 -2603514 7416445 0.6944 2758363
Year 3 3952407 1348893 11368852 0.5787 2287273
Year 4 3233318 4582211 14602170 0.4823 1559278
TOTAL 9475248


The Net NPV after 4 years is -544711

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9475248 - 10019959 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Onlink's Stage to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Onlink's Stage has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Onlink's Stage can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Onlink's Stage, then the stock price of the Onlink's Stage should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Onlink's Stage should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of OnLink Technologies: Growth Challenges

References & Further Readings

Antonio Davila, Buaboocha Semapakdi (2018), "OnLink Technologies: Growth Challenges Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


HSBC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Kelington Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Lecip Holdings Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Techno Horizon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


El En SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Hunt Finance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


CPM SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Genomicvision SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Rainbow Heavy A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Dover SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Dicker Data SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Hardware