×




Inspirato Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Inspirato case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Inspirato case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Justin Randolph, George Foster. The Inspirato (referred as “Handler Resorts” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Inspirato Case Study


The case profiles Brad Handler, co-founder of Inspirato, as he contemplates and ultimately founds the luxury and leisure membership-based 'destination club,' shortly after selling and leaving an analogous company that he previously also founded (Exclusive Resorts). The case begins with a biographical overview of Brad Handler and the genesis of and logic for Exclusive Resorts. It provides an overview of the luxury vacation property industry, as well as the timeshare, fractional ownership and destination club industry and then dives into the Exclusive Resorts business model and company growth. After Handler decides to leave Exclusive Resorts, the case delves into his considerations and next steps as he evaluates the opportunity for an improved business model to that of Exclusive Resorts. Given Handler's unique understanding of the industry and a few of its inherent flaws (most notably capital intensity and seasonal demand), he recognizes the unique position he is in to improve upon the Exclusive Resorts model. In particular, the 'destination club' sector had previously been characterized by property acquisition and ownership-with significant capital requirements-as well as demand choppiness and supply constraints during weeks of high vacation interest. Handler considers the implications of entering into long-term leases and rental agreements with individuals and third-party vacation home owners, as well as the use of fluctuating "use rates" for each property in the 'destination club' portfolio in an attempt to both reduce the financial hurdles of entering a 'destination club' and to smooth internal demand. The case brings up a number of important considerations, including new venture formation, how and when an entrepreneur should think about a follow-up to a previous venture-especially one with similarities to a previous business and with customer overlap-business model design, and product launch. The case ends with Handler, having committed to the business and finalizing the product launch, considering how best to market the concept he is about to release publicly.


Case Authors : Justin Randolph, George Foster

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Inspirato Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002541) -10002541 - -
Year 1 3453825 -6548716 3453825 0.9434 3258325
Year 2 3972301 -2576415 7426126 0.89 3535334
Year 3 3954178 1377763 11380304 0.8396 3320004
Year 4 3235840 4613603 14616144 0.7921 2563088
TOTAL 14616144 12676752




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2674211

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Handler Resorts shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Handler Resorts have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Inspirato

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Handler Resorts often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Handler Resorts needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002541) -10002541 - -
Year 1 3453825 -6548716 3453825 0.8696 3003326
Year 2 3972301 -2576415 7426126 0.7561 3003630
Year 3 3954178 1377763 11380304 0.6575 2599936
Year 4 3235840 4613603 14616144 0.5718 1850102
TOTAL 10456995


The Net NPV after 4 years is 454454

(10456995 - 10002541 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002541) -10002541 - -
Year 1 3453825 -6548716 3453825 0.8333 2878188
Year 2 3972301 -2576415 7426126 0.6944 2758542
Year 3 3954178 1377763 11380304 0.5787 2288297
Year 4 3235840 4613603 14616144 0.4823 1560494
TOTAL 9485521


The Net NPV after 4 years is -517020

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9485521 - 10002541 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Handler Resorts to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Handler Resorts has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Handler Resorts can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Handler Resorts, then the stock price of the Handler Resorts should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Handler Resorts should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Inspirato

References & Further Readings

Justin Randolph, George Foster (2018), "Inspirato Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Dunedin Enterprise SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Skanska B ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


SANUWAVE SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


KS Energy Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Bayside Land SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Bitcoin Investment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Dell SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Storage Devices


Northern Bear SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Despegar.com SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Personal Services