×




Virgin America (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Virgin America (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Virgin America (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Adam Berman, Frank C. Schultz. The Virgin America (A) (referred as “Virgin Airline” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Managing people, Marketing, Organizational culture, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Virgin America (A) Case Study


This case illustrates how Virgin America, founded in 2007, craved a niche of dedicated urbanite-flyers in the highly competitive -- but staid -- airline industry by redefining the passenger flying experience. In 2012, approximately 20 percent of Virgin America's passengers accounted for 80 percent of the airline's revenue. The A case begins with Virgin America's launch in August 2007, when the airline began with transcontinental flights between New York City and Los Angeles and San Francisco, and then goes through August 2012, after the airline had expanded into 19 market destinations across the United States and Mexico but was still unprofitable. In the A case, the dynamics of the airline industry, customer experience and loyalty, and niche marketing are explored. The A case ends with several questions, including those asking students to evaluate Virgin America's business model and to identify the action steps needed to reach profitability. The B case then covers Virgin America during 2013 and the decisions Cush and his management team made to make the airline profitable that year, an important financial milestone prior to any possible IPO. The C case concludes with Virgin America's successful IPO in November 2014. Please note: this case also has two supplementary cases available. The (B) and (C) supplements can be found using product numbers B5829 and B5830.


Case Authors : Adam Berman, Frank C. Schultz

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Leadership, Managing people, Marketing, Organizational culture, Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Virgin America (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003927) -10003927 - -
Year 1 3461582 -6542345 3461582 0.9434 3265643
Year 2 3980323 -2562022 7441905 0.89 3542473
Year 3 3958500 1396478 11400405 0.8396 3323633
Year 4 3223485 4619963 14623890 0.7921 2553302
TOTAL 14623890 12685052




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2681125

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Virgin Airline have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Virgin Airline shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Virgin America (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Virgin Airline often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Virgin Airline needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003927) -10003927 - -
Year 1 3461582 -6542345 3461582 0.8696 3010071
Year 2 3980323 -2562022 7441905 0.7561 3009696
Year 3 3958500 1396478 11400405 0.6575 2602778
Year 4 3223485 4619963 14623890 0.5718 1843038
TOTAL 10465583


The Net NPV after 4 years is 461656

(10465583 - 10003927 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003927) -10003927 - -
Year 1 3461582 -6542345 3461582 0.8333 2884652
Year 2 3980323 -2562022 7441905 0.6944 2764113
Year 3 3958500 1396478 11400405 0.5787 2290799
Year 4 3223485 4619963 14623890 0.4823 1554536
TOTAL 9494099


The Net NPV after 4 years is -509828

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494099 - 10003927 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Virgin Airline to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Virgin Airline has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Virgin Airline can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Virgin Airline, then the stock price of the Virgin Airline should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Virgin Airline should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Virgin America (A)

References & Further Readings

Adam Berman, Frank C. Schultz (2018), "Virgin America (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


IDEX SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


OPC Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Takara Holdings Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


EIH SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Steele Oceanic SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Voya Prime Rate Trust SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


KNC Labs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Molson Coors Canada SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Tongfang Kontafarma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


China Primary Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Iliad SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services