×




Coinmen Consultants LLP: Adopting a Technology-Based Learning Culture Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Coinmen Consultants LLP: Adopting a Technology-Based Learning Culture case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Coinmen Consultants LLP: Adopting a Technology-Based Learning Culture case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Pranati Aggarwal, Jyotsna Bhatnagar. The Coinmen Consultants LLP: Adopting a Technology-Based Learning Culture (referred as “Coinmen Knowledge” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IT, Knowledge management, Talent management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Coinmen Consultants LLP: Adopting a Technology-Based Learning Culture Case Study


In 2016, the three co-founders of Coinmen Consultants LLP (Coinmen), an independent business advisory and chartered accountancy firm in New Delhi, faced a dilemma with respect to the knowledge management process at their firm. Due to the firm's rapid growth, a change was certainly necessary, but the partners held some reservations about adopting a technological process for knowledge-sharing in their company. Would the implementation of a knowledge management system have a negative impact on the learning culture of Coinmen by providing the employees with ready-made solutions? Would it make employees dependent on technology, thus compromising their personal development? How could Coinmen ensure that the new technology would be used in combination with-not instead of- employee expertise? And finally, after a knowledge management system was introduced, should Coinmen also consider implementing a human resources information system and talent analytics? The authors are affiliated with Management Development Institute.


Case Authors : Pranati Aggarwal, Jyotsna Bhatnagar

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : IT, Knowledge management, Talent management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Coinmen Consultants LLP: Adopting a Technology-Based Learning Culture Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017134) -10017134 - -
Year 1 3472714 -6544420 3472714 0.9434 3276145
Year 2 3979059 -2565361 7451773 0.89 3541348
Year 3 3962369 1397008 11414142 0.8396 3326881
Year 4 3233396 4630404 14647538 0.7921 2561152
TOTAL 14647538 12705528




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2688394

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Coinmen Knowledge have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Coinmen Knowledge shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Coinmen Consultants LLP: Adopting a Technology-Based Learning Culture

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Coinmen Knowledge often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Coinmen Knowledge needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017134) -10017134 - -
Year 1 3472714 -6544420 3472714 0.8696 3019751
Year 2 3979059 -2565361 7451773 0.7561 3008740
Year 3 3962369 1397008 11414142 0.6575 2605322
Year 4 3233396 4630404 14647538 0.5718 1848705
TOTAL 10482518


The Net NPV after 4 years is 465384

(10482518 - 10017134 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017134) -10017134 - -
Year 1 3472714 -6544420 3472714 0.8333 2893928
Year 2 3979059 -2565361 7451773 0.6944 2763235
Year 3 3962369 1397008 11414142 0.5787 2293038
Year 4 3233396 4630404 14647538 0.4823 1559315
TOTAL 9509517


The Net NPV after 4 years is -507617

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9509517 - 10017134 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Coinmen Knowledge to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Coinmen Knowledge has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Coinmen Knowledge can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Coinmen Knowledge, then the stock price of the Coinmen Knowledge should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Coinmen Knowledge should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Coinmen Consultants LLP: Adopting a Technology-Based Learning Culture

References & Further Readings

Pranati Aggarwal, Jyotsna Bhatnagar (2018), "Coinmen Consultants LLP: Adopting a Technology-Based Learning Culture Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


3M India SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


It Way SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


SalvaRx Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Coffee Holding SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Polar Capital Healthcare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Taubman Centers SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Praxis Home Retail SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


Hammerson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations