×




Jurlique: Globalizing Beauty from Nature and Science Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Jurlique: Globalizing Beauty from Nature and Science case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Jurlique: Globalizing Beauty from Nature and Science case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Geoffrey G. Jones, Andrew Spadafora. The Jurlique: Globalizing Beauty from Nature and Science (referred as “Jurlique's Pola” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Globalization, Marketing, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Jurlique: Globalizing Beauty from Nature and Science Case Study


Considers the marketing and strategic challenges faced by natural beauty brands using the case of Australian-based Jurlique, which was acquired by Pola of Japan in 2011. The case opens two years later in July 2013 when Sam McKay, the chief executive officer, on a visit to Pola's head office in Tokyo, heard news of critical comments about the company and animal testing in a Facebook post from a group in South Australia, where the brand had been founded as a small biodynamic farm in 1985. The discussion of Jurlique's involvement with animal testing was a sensitive issue as it contradicted the brand's strong environmentally-friendly and ethical positioning. The matter had already arisen during the Pola acquisition as Pola, like all Japanese cosmetics companies, traditionally tested products on animals. The animal testing issue is put in context by a discussion of how during Jurlique's growth as a successful premium brand there had been substantial changes in market position, in part associated with shifts of ownership. At times the brand had been focused on core green consumers, but McKay had sought to broaden the consumer base by repositioning it as making "the most effective products as natural as possible." The company lost few existing customers, and found that Jurlique's image was an asset in attracting Chinese consumers who liked the story of the Australian farm which produced most ingredients. However, Chinese regulations refusing to allow the firm's stores to use recycled wood, and mandating of animal testing, were challenging to the brand's global natural brand position. The case can be taught both in marketing classes concerned with green business and in strategy classes exploring the challenges faced by global brands.


Case Authors : Geoffrey G. Jones, Andrew Spadafora

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Globalization, Marketing, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Jurlique: Globalizing Beauty from Nature and Science Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012667) -10012667 - -
Year 1 3451895 -6560772 3451895 0.9434 3256505
Year 2 3976196 -2584576 7428091 0.89 3538800
Year 3 3943137 1358561 11371228 0.8396 3310734
Year 4 3251781 4610342 14623009 0.7921 2575715
TOTAL 14623009 12681754




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2669087

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Jurlique's Pola shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Jurlique's Pola have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Jurlique: Globalizing Beauty from Nature and Science

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Jurlique's Pola often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Jurlique's Pola needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012667) -10012667 - -
Year 1 3451895 -6560772 3451895 0.8696 3001648
Year 2 3976196 -2584576 7428091 0.7561 3006575
Year 3 3943137 1358561 11371228 0.6575 2592677
Year 4 3251781 4610342 14623009 0.5718 1859216
TOTAL 10460116


The Net NPV after 4 years is 447449

(10460116 - 10012667 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012667) -10012667 - -
Year 1 3451895 -6560772 3451895 0.8333 2876579
Year 2 3976196 -2584576 7428091 0.6944 2761247
Year 3 3943137 1358561 11371228 0.5787 2281908
Year 4 3251781 4610342 14623009 0.4823 1568181
TOTAL 9487916


The Net NPV after 4 years is -524751

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487916 - 10012667 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Jurlique's Pola to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Jurlique's Pola has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Jurlique's Pola can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Jurlique's Pola, then the stock price of the Jurlique's Pola should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Jurlique's Pola should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Jurlique: Globalizing Beauty from Nature and Science

References & Further Readings

Geoffrey G. Jones, Andrew Spadafora (2018), "Jurlique: Globalizing Beauty from Nature and Science Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Lam Research SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Aortech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


MESCO SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Philip Morris SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Tobacco


Oricon Enterprises Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Regional Management SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services