×




MentorMob and the Reinvention of Learning Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for MentorMob and the Reinvention of Learning case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. MentorMob and the Reinvention of Learning case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Shane Greenstein, Josh Polhans, Micheline Sabatte. The MentorMob and the Reinvention of Learning (referred as “Learning Chinosorn” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Growth strategy, Innovation, IT, Social platforms, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of MentorMob and the Reinvention of Learning Case Study


MentorMob had sprung from the passions-for web development and for online communities-of the company's co-founders, Kris Chinosorn (CEO) and Vince Leung (COO). The company pursued the ambitious goals of reinventing the way people learn and becoming the world's utility for learning about anything. The website leveraged a crowdsourcing model for information sharing, teaching, and learning. By enabling participants to learn-and to crowdsource from each other while learning-the site sought to both engage users at different stages of learning and to develop a compelling experience unobtainable without a crowd. Chinosorn and Leung needed to prioritize in order to achieve the growth and scale needed to become world's utility for learning. What should they do next to keep MentorMob's growth on track? What issues should get their greatest attention?


Case Authors : Shane Greenstein, Josh Polhans, Micheline Sabatte

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Growth strategy, Innovation, IT, Social platforms, Strategic planning




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for MentorMob and the Reinvention of Learning Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003911) -10003911 - -
Year 1 3443570 -6560341 3443570 0.9434 3248651
Year 2 3966052 -2594289 7409622 0.89 3529772
Year 3 3936557 1342268 11346179 0.8396 3305209
Year 4 3250271 4592539 14596450 0.7921 2574519
TOTAL 14596450 12658151




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2654240

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Learning Chinosorn have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Learning Chinosorn shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of MentorMob and the Reinvention of Learning

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Learning Chinosorn often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Learning Chinosorn needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003911) -10003911 - -
Year 1 3443570 -6560341 3443570 0.8696 2994409
Year 2 3966052 -2594289 7409622 0.7561 2998905
Year 3 3936557 1342268 11346179 0.6575 2588350
Year 4 3250271 4592539 14596450 0.5718 1858353
TOTAL 10440017


The Net NPV after 4 years is 436106

(10440017 - 10003911 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10003911) -10003911 - -
Year 1 3443570 -6560341 3443570 0.8333 2869642
Year 2 3966052 -2594289 7409622 0.6944 2754203
Year 3 3936557 1342268 11346179 0.5787 2278100
Year 4 3250271 4592539 14596450 0.4823 1567453
TOTAL 9469398


The Net NPV after 4 years is -534513

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9469398 - 10003911 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Learning Chinosorn to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Learning Chinosorn has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Learning Chinosorn can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Learning Chinosorn, then the stock price of the Learning Chinosorn should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Learning Chinosorn should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of MentorMob and the Reinvention of Learning

References & Further Readings

Shane Greenstein, Josh Polhans, Micheline Sabatte (2018), "MentorMob and the Reinvention of Learning Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Malayan Flour Mills SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Camtek SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Scatec Solar OL SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Avalara SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


ORBC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Oncard International Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Phoenitron SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Area Quest SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing