×




Wildfire Interactive Inc. (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Wildfire Interactive Inc. (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Wildfire Interactive Inc. (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by George Foster, Jason Luther. The Wildfire Interactive Inc. (A) (referred as “Wildfire Chuard” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Mergers & acquisitions, Social platforms.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Wildfire Interactive Inc. (A) Case Study


It was June 2011, and Alain Chuard and Victoria Ransom reflected on their history as founders of Wildfire Interactive Inc. (Wildfire). Originally called Promotion Builder, Wildfire had evolved from an in-house marketing solution used by the duo's adventure travel company to a multi-platform software program used by thousands of businesses globally. The Wildfire product enabled these customers to develop customized social-media marketing campaigns composed of video and essay competitions, user-generated contests, quizzes, and coupons. Users could then push these promotions to their websites or social networks, such as Facebook, hi5, and LinkedIn. Through this evolution, the team contended with a myriad of difficulties, including attracting talent, navigating international markets, and building and scaling operations. In particular, obstacles associated with cultural differences and geographical distance made it challenging for the company to maintain effective operations overseas. Moreover, relative to its competitors, Wildfire was substantially under-funded and under-marketed. This made it difficult for the founders to decide when the company should either accept or turn away lucrative-yet demanding-high-profile customers. Chuard and Ransom were now at another critical decision point in the organization's lifecycle. Wildfire had traditionally been a campaign-based product. Under this model, Wildfire was offered to customers for an initial fee plus a per-day charge, the size of which was dependent upon the feature set chosen by the customer. Recent pressures from investors and consumers, however, had pushed the founders to consider a transition to a subscription-based platform that would provide timeline and stream management, analytics, and page-management functionality. Whereas the founders knew that transforming business models could have various positive effects for Wildfire, implementing the change would also inherently alter the company and its product


Case Authors : George Foster, Jason Luther

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Marketing, Mergers & acquisitions, Social platforms




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Wildfire Interactive Inc. (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024041) -10024041 - -
Year 1 3445950 -6578091 3445950 0.9434 3250896
Year 2 3958317 -2619774 7404267 0.89 3522888
Year 3 3973291 1353517 11377558 0.8396 3336052
Year 4 3242125 4595642 14619683 0.7921 2568067
TOTAL 14619683 12677903




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2653862

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Wildfire Chuard have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Wildfire Chuard shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Wildfire Interactive Inc. (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Wildfire Chuard often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Wildfire Chuard needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024041) -10024041 - -
Year 1 3445950 -6578091 3445950 0.8696 2996478
Year 2 3958317 -2619774 7404267 0.7561 2993056
Year 3 3973291 1353517 11377558 0.6575 2612503
Year 4 3242125 4595642 14619683 0.5718 1853695
TOTAL 10455733


The Net NPV after 4 years is 431692

(10455733 - 10024041 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024041) -10024041 - -
Year 1 3445950 -6578091 3445950 0.8333 2871625
Year 2 3958317 -2619774 7404267 0.6944 2748831
Year 3 3973291 1353517 11377558 0.5787 2299358
Year 4 3242125 4595642 14619683 0.4823 1563525
TOTAL 9483339


The Net NPV after 4 years is -540702

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483339 - 10024041 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Wildfire Chuard to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Wildfire Chuard has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Wildfire Chuard can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Wildfire Chuard, then the stock price of the Wildfire Chuard should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Wildfire Chuard should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Wildfire Interactive Inc. (A)

References & Further Readings

George Foster, Jason Luther (2018), "Wildfire Interactive Inc. (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Star Mica SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Sprint SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


TCG BDC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


C I Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


QEP Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Orocobre SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Non-Metallic Mining


Liquidmetal Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Jiangsu Huaxin A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Nova MSC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming