×




Tough Choices for the Illinois Pension System Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Tough Choices for the Illinois Pension System case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Tough Choices for the Illinois Pension System case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert C. Pozen, Brij Khurana. The Tough Choices for the Illinois Pension System (referred as “Pension Governor” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Government.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Tough Choices for the Illinois Pension System Case Study


This case describes the precarious fiscal situation of the Illinois public pension system in the spring of 2009 and the accounting of pension plans by nonfederal municipalities more generally. In February 2009, in the midst of a recession, recently appointed Governor Quinn had to lay out his budget for the coming fiscal year and tackle the state's underfunded public pension, its largest liability. Immediately, the governor needed to raise funds to make the state's annual contribution to the pension plan, and at the same time he needed to come up with a plan for pension reform to prevent the future insolvency of the state. Governor Quinn had a number of levers he could employ, including changing the asset allocation of the pension funds; directly tackling entitlements through a defined benefit or defined contribution plan; or implementing a package of pension bonds, taxes, and employee contributions. Through this case, students should more fully understand pension accounting and the hard choices that many states will face because of their outstanding pension liabilities.


Case Authors : Robert C. Pozen, Brij Khurana

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Government




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Tough Choices for the Illinois Pension System Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019604) -10019604 - -
Year 1 3471679 -6547925 3471679 0.9434 3275169
Year 2 3965520 -2582405 7437199 0.89 3529299
Year 3 3968869 1386464 11406068 0.8396 3332339
Year 4 3244215 4630679 14650283 0.7921 2569722
TOTAL 14650283 12706529




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2686925

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Pension Governor have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Pension Governor shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Tough Choices for the Illinois Pension System

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Pension Governor often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Pension Governor needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019604) -10019604 - -
Year 1 3471679 -6547925 3471679 0.8696 3018851
Year 2 3965520 -2582405 7437199 0.7561 2998503
Year 3 3968869 1386464 11406068 0.6575 2609596
Year 4 3244215 4630679 14650283 0.5718 1854890
TOTAL 10481840


The Net NPV after 4 years is 462236

(10481840 - 10019604 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019604) -10019604 - -
Year 1 3471679 -6547925 3471679 0.8333 2893066
Year 2 3965520 -2582405 7437199 0.6944 2753833
Year 3 3968869 1386464 11406068 0.5787 2296799
Year 4 3244215 4630679 14650283 0.4823 1564533
TOTAL 9508231


The Net NPV after 4 years is -511373

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9508231 - 10019604 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Pension Governor to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Pension Governor has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Pension Governor can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Pension Governor, then the stock price of the Pension Governor should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Pension Governor should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Tough Choices for the Illinois Pension System

References & Further Readings

Robert C. Pozen, Brij Khurana (2018), "Tough Choices for the Illinois Pension System Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Mason Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Mudrick Capital A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Linewell Software SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Anadarko Petroleum SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


ITAUSA PN SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Ennox Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


TSH Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Crops


Shanghai Shimao SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services