×




Rwanda Dimension Technology: Treading Water in Africa Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Rwanda Dimension Technology: Treading Water in Africa case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Rwanda Dimension Technology: Treading Water in Africa case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mary B. Teagarden, Chad Nygeres, Michael Byme, Andreas Schotter. The Rwanda Dimension Technology: Treading Water in Africa (referred as “Computers Rwanda” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Rwanda Dimension Technology: Treading Water in Africa Case Study


Jules Munyampeta, founder and CEO of RD Tech Rwanda, was questioning his company's current strategy. The ICT market in Rwanda had transformed significantly since the company was founded in 2005. RD Tech began as a computer importer that sourced new laptop computers from Dubai. Munyampeta soon realized that the market for new computers in Rwanda was very small, and subsequently had great success with a new approach-importing and selling refurbished used computers from the United States. The lower price point for refurbished computers allowed RD Tech to expand its market and have a greater impact on Rwandan society. Originally, the company sold personal computers to individuals, but quickly shifted focus to schools and government institutions as a result of changes in government policy. This shift resulted in rapid growth, and RD Tech Rwanda expanded distribution of refurbished computers throughout Rwanda, Burundi, and eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. RD Tech survived the impact of the global financial crisis, competition from Chinese entrants into the Rwandan market, and NGOs, such as One Laptop per Child, providing free computers to schoolchildren when, suddenly, sales came to a crashing halt. The Rwandan government made rapid technological advancement a priority for public schools and local governmental agencies, but refurbished computers and monitors were no longer acceptable for these institutions. Munyampeta considered his options. Was integrating the refurbishment operations into the East African supply chain the answer? Would this strategy deliver sufficient cost savings to justify the initial capital outlay and continuing operational costs? If so, could Winter and Brice raise the capital required to make the change? Or might a return to the original unsuccessful model of selling new computers now be feasible? Munyampeta wondered if, instead of focusing on a growth strategy, he should be considering a liquidation strategy.


Case Authors : Mary B. Teagarden, Chad Nygeres, Michael Byme, Andreas Schotter

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Risk management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Rwanda Dimension Technology: Treading Water in Africa Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020534) -10020534 - -
Year 1 3443617 -6576917 3443617 0.9434 3248695
Year 2 3958612 -2618305 7402229 0.89 3523151
Year 3 3963391 1345086 11365620 0.8396 3327740
Year 4 3240854 4585940 14606474 0.7921 2567060
TOTAL 14606474 12666645




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2646111

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Computers Rwanda shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Computers Rwanda have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Rwanda Dimension Technology: Treading Water in Africa

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Computers Rwanda often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Computers Rwanda needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020534) -10020534 - -
Year 1 3443617 -6576917 3443617 0.8696 2994450
Year 2 3958612 -2618305 7402229 0.7561 2993279
Year 3 3963391 1345086 11365620 0.6575 2605994
Year 4 3240854 4585940 14606474 0.5718 1852969
TOTAL 10446692


The Net NPV after 4 years is 426158

(10446692 - 10020534 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020534) -10020534 - -
Year 1 3443617 -6576917 3443617 0.8333 2869681
Year 2 3958612 -2618305 7402229 0.6944 2749036
Year 3 3963391 1345086 11365620 0.5787 2293629
Year 4 3240854 4585940 14606474 0.4823 1562912
TOTAL 9475258


The Net NPV after 4 years is -545276

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9475258 - 10020534 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Computers Rwanda to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Computers Rwanda has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Computers Rwanda can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Computers Rwanda, then the stock price of the Computers Rwanda should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Computers Rwanda should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Rwanda Dimension Technology: Treading Water in Africa

References & Further Readings

Mary B. Teagarden, Chad Nygeres, Michael Byme, Andreas Schotter (2018), "Rwanda Dimension Technology: Treading Water in Africa Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


USP Group Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


New Century Healthcare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Profound Medical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Tianshan Wool A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Tamron Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Scholar Rock SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs