×




Innovation at Timberland: Thinking Outside the Shoe Box Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Innovation at Timberland: Thinking Outside the Shoe Box case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Innovation at Timberland: Thinking Outside the Shoe Box case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Ryan Raffaelli. The Innovation at Timberland: Thinking Outside the Shoe Box (referred as “Timberland's Timberland” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy, Leadership, Organizational culture, Product development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Innovation at Timberland: Thinking Outside the Shoe Box Case Study


Innovation was linked to Timberland's heritage. In 2005, CEO Jeff Swartz and COO Ken Pucker hoped the Invention Factory, an advanced concept lab, would develop new breakthrough products and reinvigorate the company's culture of innovation. Since the 1960s, Timberland had relied on innovation, developing the world's first waterproof boot and, in the 1980s, category-defining boat shoes and day hiking boots. Creating variations of these core products, along with expansion into apparel, had sustained Timberland's business for more than 30 years. Timberland's growth in the past six years was due to increased international sales and new customer segments. As Timberland's leaders looked to the future, they hoped Doug Clark, a biomechanist, and his Invention Factory team would bring a scientific approach toward building the next generation of Timberland products and ideas. The team had to convince those in the mainstream business to accept their new ideas and integrate them back into the product line.


Case Authors : Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Ryan Raffaelli

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Growth strategy, Leadership, Organizational culture, Product development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Innovation at Timberland: Thinking Outside the Shoe Box Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009820) -10009820 - -
Year 1 3462307 -6547513 3462307 0.9434 3266327
Year 2 3972563 -2574950 7434870 0.89 3535567
Year 3 3975825 1400875 11410695 0.8396 3338179
Year 4 3229525 4630400 14640220 0.7921 2558086
TOTAL 14640220 12698160




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2688340

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Timberland's Timberland shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Timberland's Timberland have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Innovation at Timberland: Thinking Outside the Shoe Box

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Timberland's Timberland often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Timberland's Timberland needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009820) -10009820 - -
Year 1 3462307 -6547513 3462307 0.8696 3010702
Year 2 3972563 -2574950 7434870 0.7561 3003828
Year 3 3975825 1400875 11410695 0.6575 2614169
Year 4 3229525 4630400 14640220 0.5718 1846491
TOTAL 10475191


The Net NPV after 4 years is 465371

(10475191 - 10009820 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009820) -10009820 - -
Year 1 3462307 -6547513 3462307 0.8333 2885256
Year 2 3972563 -2574950 7434870 0.6944 2758724
Year 3 3975825 1400875 11410695 0.5787 2300825
Year 4 3229525 4630400 14640220 0.4823 1557448
TOTAL 9502253


The Net NPV after 4 years is -507567

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9502253 - 10009820 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Timberland's Timberland to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Timberland's Timberland has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Timberland's Timberland can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Timberland's Timberland, then the stock price of the Timberland's Timberland should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Timberland's Timberland should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Innovation at Timberland: Thinking Outside the Shoe Box

References & Further Readings

Rosabeth Moss Kanter, Ryan Raffaelli (2018), "Innovation at Timberland: Thinking Outside the Shoe Box Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Alcentra SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Tetragon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


SD Biotechnologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Jd.Com Inc Adr SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Catalog & Mail Order)