×




Innovation Strategy at Microsoft: Clouds on the Horizon Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Innovation Strategy at Microsoft: Clouds on the Horizon case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Innovation Strategy at Microsoft: Clouds on the Horizon case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Raul Chao, Stylianos Kavadias. The Innovation Strategy at Microsoft: Clouds on the Horizon (referred as “Microsoft Innovation” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Operations management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Innovation Strategy at Microsoft: Clouds on the Horizon Case Study


Microsoft employs 90,000 people and its products affect millions of users around the world every day. Developing the next version of Windows or Office is easy for Microsoft, but the company has struggled when it comes to more radical innovation. Intense competition from Google, Apple, and others threatens a business model that has delivered tremendous success over 25 years. This case highlights the strategic challenges facing Microsoft and provides insights into the organizational, leadership, and operational issues that must be addressed in order to define a successful innovation strategy at one of the world's most well-known companies.


Case Authors : Raul Chao, Stylianos Kavadias

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Operations management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Innovation Strategy at Microsoft: Clouds on the Horizon Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014062) -10014062 - -
Year 1 3468831 -6545231 3468831 0.9434 3272482
Year 2 3966081 -2579150 7434912 0.89 3529798
Year 3 3940727 1361577 11375639 0.8396 3308710
Year 4 3224936 4586513 14600575 0.7921 2554451
TOTAL 14600575 12665442




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2651380

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Microsoft Innovation shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Microsoft Innovation have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Innovation Strategy at Microsoft: Clouds on the Horizon

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Microsoft Innovation often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Microsoft Innovation needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014062) -10014062 - -
Year 1 3468831 -6545231 3468831 0.8696 3016375
Year 2 3966081 -2579150 7434912 0.7561 2998927
Year 3 3940727 1361577 11375639 0.6575 2591092
Year 4 3224936 4586513 14600575 0.5718 1843868
TOTAL 10450261


The Net NPV after 4 years is 436199

(10450261 - 10014062 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014062) -10014062 - -
Year 1 3468831 -6545231 3468831 0.8333 2890693
Year 2 3966081 -2579150 7434912 0.6944 2754223
Year 3 3940727 1361577 11375639 0.5787 2280513
Year 4 3224936 4586513 14600575 0.4823 1555235
TOTAL 9480664


The Net NPV after 4 years is -533398

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9480664 - 10014062 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Microsoft Innovation to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Microsoft Innovation has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Microsoft Innovation can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Microsoft Innovation, then the stock price of the Microsoft Innovation should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Microsoft Innovation should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Innovation Strategy at Microsoft: Clouds on the Horizon

References & Further Readings

Raul Chao, Stylianos Kavadias (2018), "Innovation Strategy at Microsoft: Clouds on the Horizon Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Tableau Software SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Kobayashi Metals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Sauer Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


HangZhou Radical Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


KPa-BM SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Hanchang Ind SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Wuhan Zhongyuan Huadian Sci Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Pungkang SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Nomura Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


BioLine RX SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs