×




Avi Kremer Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Avi Kremer case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Avi Kremer case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Joshua D. Margolis, Mark Wetzel. The Avi Kremer (referred as “Kremer Avi” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership development, Managing people, Organizational culture, Social enterprise, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Avi Kremer Case Study


If you were diagnosed with a terminal illness, how would you respond and what would you do with your remaining time? Avi Kremer contemplates four options for how to devote himself 18 months after being diagnosed with ALS. His experience thus far and the choices he faces foster insight into building resilience and finding purpose. The case documents Kremer's personal history before and after diagnosis, describing the ups and downs in his life both prior to and after the diagnosis, lending insight into what enabled him to respond in the extraordinary way he has. The case highlights Kremer's remarkable efforts to fight for a cure, the doubts and obstacles he experiences along the way, and the current options Kremer faces, from returning home to spend time with family to founding a new biotech venture. Through this stark, realistic, and inspiring example, the case prompts discussion relevant to anyone at any point in life about resilience and purpose, prompting all students to reflect upon handling adversity and leading a purpose-driven life--and what it takes to equip oneself to do both.


Case Authors : Joshua D. Margolis, Mark Wetzel

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Leadership development, Managing people, Organizational culture, Social enterprise, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Avi Kremer Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020385) -10020385 - -
Year 1 3450730 -6569655 3450730 0.9434 3255406
Year 2 3965778 -2603877 7416508 0.89 3529528
Year 3 3946348 1342471 11362856 0.8396 3313430
Year 4 3247508 4589979 14610364 0.7921 2572331
TOTAL 14610364 12670694




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2650309

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Kremer Avi shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Kremer Avi have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Avi Kremer

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Kremer Avi often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Kremer Avi needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020385) -10020385 - -
Year 1 3450730 -6569655 3450730 0.8696 3000635
Year 2 3965778 -2603877 7416508 0.7561 2998698
Year 3 3946348 1342471 11362856 0.6575 2594788
Year 4 3247508 4589979 14610364 0.5718 1856773
TOTAL 10450894


The Net NPV after 4 years is 430509

(10450894 - 10020385 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020385) -10020385 - -
Year 1 3450730 -6569655 3450730 0.8333 2875608
Year 2 3965778 -2603877 7416508 0.6944 2754013
Year 3 3946348 1342471 11362856 0.5787 2283766
Year 4 3247508 4589979 14610364 0.4823 1566121
TOTAL 9479508


The Net NPV after 4 years is -540877

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9479508 - 10020385 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Kremer Avi to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Kremer Avi has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Kremer Avi can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Kremer Avi, then the stock price of the Kremer Avi should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Kremer Avi should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Avi Kremer

References & Further Readings

Joshua D. Margolis, Mark Wetzel (2018), "Avi Kremer Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Endocan Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


William Demant SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Shandong Head SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Jse SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Nissan Motor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


HaiNan Pearl River B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Yisheng Poultry A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock


Timken SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Kawakin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel