Persephone's Pomegranate? Credit Agricole and Emporiki Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Persephone's Pomegranate? Credit Agricole and Emporiki case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Persephone's Pomegranate? Credit Agricole and Emporiki case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Dante Roscini, Daniela Beyersdorfer, Jerome Lenhardt. The Persephone's Pomegranate? Credit Agricole and Emporiki (referred as “Greek Agricole” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Economic development, Economics, Entrepreneurship, Financial management, Government, International business, Marketing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Persephone's Pomegranate? Credit Agricole and Emporiki Case Study

In 2006 the French bank CrA©dit Agricole bought the Greek Emporiki bank, for a‚¬2.8 billion, at the peak of a bull market for bank takeovers. Six years, a major financial crisis, and 5.2 billion of losses later, in a context of great uncertainty in the European banking sector, what decision should CrA©dit Agricole take regarding Emporiki? Through the example of this European cross-border acquisition the case looks at the Greek banking system before and during the unprecedented Greek sovereign debt crisis; the efforts of Greece and the main actors of the European financial system to prevent the battled country from having to exit the euro zone; and the potential scenarios for Greek banks in mid-2012.

Case Authors : Dante Roscini, Daniela Beyersdorfer, Jerome Lenhardt

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Economic development, Economics, Entrepreneurship, Financial management, Government, International business, Marketing

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Persephone's Pomegranate? Credit Agricole and Emporiki Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10019615)	-10019615	-	-
Year 1	3458721	-6560894	3458721	0.9434	3262944
Year 2	3978960	-2581934	7437681	0.89	3541260
Year 3	3936400	1354466	11374081	0.8396	3305077
Year 4	3244746	4599212	14618827	0.7921	2570143
TOTAL			14618827		12679425

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2659810

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Greek Agricole have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Greek Agricole shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Persephone's Pomegranate? Credit Agricole and Emporiki

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Greek Agricole often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Greek Agricole needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10019615)	-10019615	-	-
Year 1	3458721	-6560894	3458721	0.8696	3007583
Year 2	3978960	-2581934	7437681	0.7561	3008665
Year 3	3936400	1354466	11374081	0.6575	2588247
Year 4	3244746	4599212	14618827	0.5718	1855194
TOTAL					10459690

The Net NPV after 4 years is 440075

(10459690 - 10019615 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10019615)	-10019615	-	-
Year 1	3458721	-6560894	3458721	0.8333	2882268
Year 2	3978960	-2581934	7437681	0.6944	2763167
Year 3	3936400	1354466	11374081	0.5787	2278009
Year 4	3244746	4599212	14618827	0.4823	1564789
TOTAL					9488232

The Net NPV after 4 years is -531383

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488232 - 10019615 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Greek Agricole to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Greek Agricole has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Greek Agricole can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Greek Agricole, then the stock price of the Greek Agricole should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Greek Agricole should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Persephone's Pomegranate? Credit Agricole and Emporiki

References & Further Readings

Dante Roscini, Daniela Beyersdorfer, Jerome Lenhardt (2018), "Persephone's Pomegranate? Credit Agricole and Emporiki Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.