×




The Ascendance of AirAsia: Building a Successful Budget Airline in Asia Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Ascendance of AirAsia: Building a Successful Budget Airline in Asia case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Ascendance of AirAsia: Building a Successful Budget Airline in Asia case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Thomas Lawton, Jonathan P. Doh. The The Ascendance of AirAsia: Building a Successful Budget Airline in Asia (referred as “Airasia Fernandes” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy, International business, Marketing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Ascendance of AirAsia: Building a Successful Budget Airline in Asia Case Study


In September 2001, Tony Fernandes left his job as vice president and head of Warner Music's Southeast Asian operations. He reportedly cashed in his stock options, took out a mortgage on his house, and lined up investors to take control of AirAsia, a struggling Malaysian airline. Three days later, terrorists destroyed the World Trade Center. Despite the negative aftermath of the 9-11 attacks, by 2003, AirAsia had demonstrated that the low-fare model epitomized by Southwest and JetBlue in the United States, and by Ryanair and easyJet in Europe, had great potential in the Asian marketplace. Now, Fernandes had to make plans to ensure that AirAsia maintained its momentum while considering the influx of new entrants into the low-fare segment of the airline industry in Asia.


Case Authors : Thomas Lawton, Jonathan P. Doh

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Growth strategy, International business, Marketing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Ascendance of AirAsia: Building a Successful Budget Airline in Asia Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017409) -10017409 - -
Year 1 3452103 -6565306 3452103 0.9434 3256701
Year 2 3968264 -2597042 7420367 0.89 3531741
Year 3 3944905 1347863 11365272 0.8396 3312218
Year 4 3245551 4593414 14610823 0.7921 2570780
TOTAL 14610823 12671440




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2654031

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Airasia Fernandes shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Airasia Fernandes have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Ascendance of AirAsia: Building a Successful Budget Airline in Asia

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Airasia Fernandes often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Airasia Fernandes needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017409) -10017409 - -
Year 1 3452103 -6565306 3452103 0.8696 3001829
Year 2 3968264 -2597042 7420367 0.7561 3000578
Year 3 3944905 1347863 11365272 0.6575 2593839
Year 4 3245551 4593414 14610823 0.5718 1855654
TOTAL 10451900


The Net NPV after 4 years is 434491

(10451900 - 10017409 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017409) -10017409 - -
Year 1 3452103 -6565306 3452103 0.8333 2876753
Year 2 3968264 -2597042 7420367 0.6944 2755739
Year 3 3944905 1347863 11365272 0.5787 2282931
Year 4 3245551 4593414 14610823 0.4823 1565177
TOTAL 9480600


The Net NPV after 4 years is -536809

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9480600 - 10017409 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Airasia Fernandes to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Airasia Fernandes has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Airasia Fernandes can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Airasia Fernandes, then the stock price of the Airasia Fernandes should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Airasia Fernandes should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Ascendance of AirAsia: Building a Successful Budget Airline in Asia

References & Further Readings

Thomas Lawton, Jonathan P. Doh (2018), "The Ascendance of AirAsia: Building a Successful Budget Airline in Asia Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Leaguer Stock A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Bega Cheese SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Mindtell Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Automobile &Pc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Trigyn Technologies Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Empire Diversified Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


Forval Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Office Equipment