×




Cultivating Social Enterprise in Peru: A Portfolio Approach Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Cultivating Social Enterprise in Peru: A Portfolio Approach case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Cultivating Social Enterprise in Peru: A Portfolio Approach case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Oana Branzei, Jan Dutkiewicz. The Cultivating Social Enterprise in Peru: A Portfolio Approach (referred as “Cep Social” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Growth strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Cultivating Social Enterprise in Peru: A Portfolio Approach Case Study


A consultant with CARE Enterprise Partners (CEP) is tasked to provide consulting for three social enterprises in different stages of development, each benefiting from CEP funding and support. CONASE - an oatmeal manufacturer selling to the government's vaso de leche free breakfast program - asked for advice on strategic analysis and creative approaches to customer relations. Seviagro - a market linkage social enterprise aggregating produce from smallholder artichoke farmers for resale to a large processing and export company - requested support with cost analysis and accounting. Corporacion Solar - initially established as a buyer and reseller of spinach produced by Andean farmers but currently transitioning from a market linkage model to a hybrid model - was looking for assistance in reshaping its growth strategy to target major buyers in Lima with a more diversified product offering. The three for-profit social enterprises profiled in this case sample a new breed of locally-reliant, market-driven models, which could further Peru's rural development in mountainous regions like the Ancash province. Their success could be tremendously influential in charting a new approach to development in the Andes. Success here could also endorse CEP's pioneering approach to development around the world. But despite careful start-up planning and very promising triple-bottom line projections, each enterprise confronted unexpected challenges in customer relations, cost management, sourcing and distribution. As these social ventures were getting off the ground, their founders' ability to simultaneously meet their social goals and remain economically viable was in jeopardy. The case asks students to put themselves in the consultant role and reposition these social ventures for sustainable growth.


Case Authors : Oana Branzei, Jan Dutkiewicz

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Growth strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Cultivating Social Enterprise in Peru: A Portfolio Approach Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019156) -10019156 - -
Year 1 3453026 -6566130 3453026 0.9434 3257572
Year 2 3969709 -2596421 7422735 0.89 3533027
Year 3 3943508 1347087 11366243 0.8396 3311045
Year 4 3222739 4569826 14588982 0.7921 2552711
TOTAL 14588982 12654355




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2635199

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cep Social have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cep Social shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Cultivating Social Enterprise in Peru: A Portfolio Approach

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cep Social often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cep Social needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019156) -10019156 - -
Year 1 3453026 -6566130 3453026 0.8696 3002631
Year 2 3969709 -2596421 7422735 0.7561 3001670
Year 3 3943508 1347087 11366243 0.6575 2592921
Year 4 3222739 4569826 14588982 0.5718 1842611
TOTAL 10439834


The Net NPV after 4 years is 420678

(10439834 - 10019156 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019156) -10019156 - -
Year 1 3453026 -6566130 3453026 0.8333 2877522
Year 2 3969709 -2596421 7422735 0.6944 2756742
Year 3 3943508 1347087 11366243 0.5787 2282123
Year 4 3222739 4569826 14588982 0.4823 1554176
TOTAL 9470563


The Net NPV after 4 years is -548593

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9470563 - 10019156 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cep Social to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cep Social has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cep Social can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cep Social, then the stock price of the Cep Social should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cep Social should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Cultivating Social Enterprise in Peru: A Portfolio Approach

References & Further Readings

Oana Branzei, Jan Dutkiewicz (2018), "Cultivating Social Enterprise in Peru: A Portfolio Approach Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

Explore More

Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.

You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of Cultivating Social Enterprise in Peru: A Portfolio Approach


Tenma Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Winning Tower SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Bechtle AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Kaneyo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Kering SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Apparel)


Kinross Gold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


QIWI SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services