×




Dan Gordon Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Dan Gordon case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Dan Gordon case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Michael J. Roberts. The Dan Gordon (referred as “Dan Csi” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Growth strategy, Health, Organizational structure, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Dan Gordon Case Study


Describes Dan Gordon's first month on the job as Chief Operating Officer of Club Sports International (CSI), a chain of 7 health and fitness clubs. Describes the company's strategy and organization. The company needs Dan to tighten up its operations and create a base that will permit CSI to grow to 30 clubs. Describes virtually no systems, controls, or mechanisms that are in place to actually manage the business. Thus students must paint this blank canvas with their view of the systems needed to manage the business, and what Dan must do to make it work.


Case Authors : Michael J. Roberts

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Growth strategy, Health, Organizational structure, Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Dan Gordon Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015619) -10015619 - -
Year 1 3456832 -6558787 3456832 0.9434 3261162
Year 2 3972080 -2586707 7428912 0.89 3535137
Year 3 3975157 1388450 11404069 0.8396 3337618
Year 4 3231004 4619454 14635073 0.7921 2559258
TOTAL 14635073 12693176




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2677557

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Dan Csi shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Dan Csi have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Dan Gordon

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Innovation & Entrepreneurship Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Dan Csi often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Dan Csi needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015619) -10015619 - -
Year 1 3456832 -6558787 3456832 0.8696 3005941
Year 2 3972080 -2586707 7428912 0.7561 3003463
Year 3 3975157 1388450 11404069 0.6575 2613730
Year 4 3231004 4619454 14635073 0.5718 1847337
TOTAL 10470471


The Net NPV after 4 years is 454852

(10470471 - 10015619 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015619) -10015619 - -
Year 1 3456832 -6558787 3456832 0.8333 2880693
Year 2 3972080 -2586707 7428912 0.6944 2758389
Year 3 3975157 1388450 11404069 0.5787 2300438
Year 4 3231004 4619454 14635073 0.4823 1558162
TOTAL 9497682


The Net NPV after 4 years is -517937

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497682 - 10015619 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Dan Csi to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Dan Csi has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Dan Csi can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Dan Csi, then the stock price of the Dan Csi should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Dan Csi should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Dan Gordon

References & Further Readings

Michael J. Roberts (2018), "Dan Gordon Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Yuancheng Cable A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Teck Guan Perdana Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Gujarat Gas Co. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


Freehill Mining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Kitz Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Black Sea SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Primary Health Care SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


MPC Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Endocyte SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Electra SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Genco Shipping Trading SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation