Anne Mulcahy: Leading Xerox Through the Perfect Storm (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Anne Mulcahy: Leading Xerox Through the Perfect Storm (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Anne Mulcahy: Leading Xerox Through the Perfect Storm (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by William W. George, Andrew N. McLean. The Anne Mulcahy: Leading Xerox Through the Perfect Storm (A) (referred as “Mulcahy Xerox” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Collaboration, Corporate governance, Crisis management, Financial management, Government, Leadership, Organizational culture, Strategy, Work-life balance.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Anne Mulcahy: Leading Xerox Through the Perfect Storm (A) Case Study

This case is accompanied by a Video Short that can be shown in class or included in a digital coursepack. Instructors should consider the timing of making the video available to students, as it may reveal key case details.In 2000, Xerox faces bankruptcy amid a liquidity crisis, collapsed profitability, and an expanding SEC investigation. Traces the career and leadership development of Anne Mulcahy, a former sales executive unexpectedly named COO of the beleaguered company as a last effort to turn Xerox around. Describes how Mulcahy assembles and motivates her team, frames her priorities, and fills her knowledge gaps in the face of critics doubtful of Xerox's ability to change. Raises questions in her mind about stakeholder priorities, employee motivation, difficult strategic trade-offs, and finding profitability while trying to avoid bankruptcy.

Case Authors : William W. George, Andrew N. McLean

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Collaboration, Corporate governance, Crisis management, Financial management, Government, Leadership, Organizational culture, Strategy, Work-life balance

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Anne Mulcahy: Leading Xerox Through the Perfect Storm (A) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10001858)	-10001858	-	-
Year 1	3466006	-6535852	3466006	0.9434	3269817
Year 2	3976807	-2559045	7442813	0.89	3539344
Year 3	3948820	1389775	11391633	0.8396	3315505
Year 4	3243374	4633149	14635007	0.7921	2569056
TOTAL			14635007		12693722

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2691864

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Mulcahy Xerox have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Mulcahy Xerox shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Anne Mulcahy: Leading Xerox Through the Perfect Storm (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Mulcahy Xerox often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Mulcahy Xerox needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10001858)	-10001858	-	-
Year 1	3466006	-6535852	3466006	0.8696	3013918
Year 2	3976807	-2559045	7442813	0.7561	3007037
Year 3	3948820	1389775	11391633	0.6575	2596413
Year 4	3243374	4633149	14635007	0.5718	1854410
TOTAL					10471779

The Net NPV after 4 years is 469921

(10471779 - 10001858 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10001858)	-10001858	-	-
Year 1	3466006	-6535852	3466006	0.8333	2888338
Year 2	3976807	-2559045	7442813	0.6944	2761672
Year 3	3948820	1389775	11391633	0.5787	2285197
Year 4	3243374	4633149	14635007	0.4823	1564127
TOTAL					9499334

The Net NPV after 4 years is -502524

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9499334 - 10001858 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Mulcahy Xerox to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Mulcahy Xerox has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Mulcahy Xerox can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Mulcahy Xerox, then the stock price of the Mulcahy Xerox should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Mulcahy Xerox should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Anne Mulcahy: Leading Xerox Through the Perfect Storm (A)

References & Further Readings

William W. George, Andrew N. McLean (2018), "Anne Mulcahy: Leading Xerox Through the Perfect Storm (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.