UNILEVER TEA (A): REVITALIZING LIPTON'S SUPPLY CHAIN Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for UNILEVER TEA (A): REVITALIZING LIPTON'S SUPPLY CHAIN case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. UNILEVER TEA (A): REVITALIZING LIPTON'S SUPPLY CHAIN case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ralf W. Seifert, Aileen Lonescu-Somers, Tania Braga, Heidi Strebel. The UNILEVER TEA (A): REVITALIZING LIPTON'S SUPPLY CHAIN (referred as “Sourcing Sustainable” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of UNILEVER TEA (A): REVITALIZING LIPTON'S SUPPLY CHAIN Case Study

The case documents Unilever's journey to revitalize Lipton brand through sourcing all its tea from Rainforest Alliance Certified (TM) farms. It provides a framework for discussions around the challenges of aligning supply chains behind the re-positioning of a high-value brand as sustainable. It also explores the business case for sustainable sourcing of agricultural raw materials and raises questions on the potential to improve the economic health of the entire supply chain. Learning objectives: Understand the business case for major brands to convert to sustainable sourcing. Understand the challenges of aligning suppliers behind a major market transformation effort. Illustrate the dilemmas of adapting to a changing business context while staying on course with long-term objectives. Change the traditional perception of business responsibility in pushing forward the agenda for action on sustainable agriculture and other "mega-issues."

Case Authors : Ralf W. Seifert, Aileen Lonescu-Somers, Tania Braga, Heidi Strebel

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for UNILEVER TEA (A): REVITALIZING LIPTON'S SUPPLY CHAIN Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10026169)	-10026169	-	-
Year 1	3448949	-6577220	3448949	0.9434	3253725
Year 2	3966521	-2610699	7415470	0.89	3530190
Year 3	3965872	1355173	11381342	0.8396	3329823
Year 4	3227776	4582949	14609118	0.7921	2556701
TOTAL			14609118		12670439

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2644270

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Sourcing Sustainable shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Sourcing Sustainable have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of UNILEVER TEA (A): REVITALIZING LIPTON'S SUPPLY CHAIN

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Sourcing Sustainable often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Sourcing Sustainable needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10026169)	-10026169	-	-
Year 1	3448949	-6577220	3448949	0.8696	2999086
Year 2	3966521	-2610699	7415470	0.7561	2999260
Year 3	3965872	1355173	11381342	0.6575	2607625
Year 4	3227776	4582949	14609118	0.5718	1845491
TOTAL					10451462

The Net NPV after 4 years is 425293

(10451462 - 10026169 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10026169)	-10026169	-	-
Year 1	3448949	-6577220	3448949	0.8333	2874124
Year 2	3966521	-2610699	7415470	0.6944	2754528
Year 3	3965872	1355173	11381342	0.5787	2295065
Year 4	3227776	4582949	14609118	0.4823	1556605
TOTAL					9480322

The Net NPV after 4 years is -545847

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9480322 - 10026169 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Sourcing Sustainable to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Sourcing Sustainable has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Sourcing Sustainable can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Sourcing Sustainable, then the stock price of the Sourcing Sustainable should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Sourcing Sustainable should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of UNILEVER TEA (A): REVITALIZING LIPTON'S SUPPLY CHAIN

References & Further Readings

Ralf W. Seifert, Aileen Lonescu-Somers, Tania Braga, Heidi Strebel (2018), "UNILEVER TEA (A): REVITALIZING LIPTON'S SUPPLY CHAIN Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.