×




Mano Dura: Mobilizing the National Guard to Battle Crime in Puerto Rico (Epilogue) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Mano Dura: Mobilizing the National Guard to Battle Crime in Puerto Rico (Epilogue) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Mano Dura: Mobilizing the National Guard to Battle Crime in Puerto Rico (Epilogue) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Marty Linsky, Harvey Simon. The Mano Dura: Mobilizing the National Guard to Battle Crime in Puerto Rico (Epilogue) (referred as “Guard Rosello” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Policy, Project management, Public relations, Regulation, Security & privacy, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Mano Dura: Mobilizing the National Guard to Battle Crime in Puerto Rico (Epilogue) Case Study


Chaos and disorder in the public housing system of San Juan, Puerto Rico (second largest in the US, prompt the newly-elected governor Pedro Rosello to consider an unprecedented new approach: using the island's national guard troops to patrol the projects. The Guard would replace police who had become so frightened or corrupted by the dominance of drug gangs in public housing that they seldom ventured into the apartment complexes at all. The National Guard, moreover, was a popular force on the island. At the same time, Rosello knew that there were risks associated with calling out the Guard. Many in its ranks were young and inexperienced. Sustaining the commitment over time would be difficult and expensive. The kind of tactics thought necessary to regain control of the projects might offend civil libertarians. The new governor, urged on by the superintendent of police, had to decide whether and how to deploy the Guard. HKS Case Number 1390.0


Case Authors : Marty Linsky, Harvey Simon

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Policy, Project management, Public relations, Regulation, Security & privacy, Strategic planning




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Mano Dura: Mobilizing the National Guard to Battle Crime in Puerto Rico (Epilogue) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023117) -10023117 - -
Year 1 3444853 -6578264 3444853 0.9434 3249861
Year 2 3957950 -2620314 7402803 0.89 3522561
Year 3 3949695 1329381 11352498 0.8396 3316240
Year 4 3247642 4577023 14600140 0.7921 2572437
TOTAL 14600140 12661099




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2637982

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Guard Rosello have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Guard Rosello shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Mano Dura: Mobilizing the National Guard to Battle Crime in Puerto Rico (Epilogue)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Guard Rosello often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Guard Rosello needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023117) -10023117 - -
Year 1 3444853 -6578264 3444853 0.8696 2995524
Year 2 3957950 -2620314 7402803 0.7561 2992779
Year 3 3949695 1329381 11352498 0.6575 2596989
Year 4 3247642 4577023 14600140 0.5718 1856850
TOTAL 10442142


The Net NPV after 4 years is 419025

(10442142 - 10023117 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10023117) -10023117 - -
Year 1 3444853 -6578264 3444853 0.8333 2870711
Year 2 3957950 -2620314 7402803 0.6944 2748576
Year 3 3949695 1329381 11352498 0.5787 2285703
Year 4 3247642 4577023 14600140 0.4823 1566185
TOTAL 9471176


The Net NPV after 4 years is -551941

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9471176 - 10023117 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Guard Rosello to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Guard Rosello has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Guard Rosello can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Guard Rosello, then the stock price of the Guard Rosello should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Guard Rosello should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Mano Dura: Mobilizing the National Guard to Battle Crime in Puerto Rico (Epilogue)

References & Further Readings

Marty Linsky, Harvey Simon (2018), "Mano Dura: Mobilizing the National Guard to Battle Crime in Puerto Rico (Epilogue) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


QEP Resources SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


LHT Holdings Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Stanley Electric Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Abivax SA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


L&F SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Gamevil SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Elion Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Elanders B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


ATA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services