×




Transforming People's Lives: The Vehicles for Change Story Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Transforming People's Lives: The Vehicles for Change Story case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Transforming People's Lives: The Vehicles for Change Story case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Tigineh Mersha, Christine Nielsen, Ven Sriram, John C. Weiss. The Transforming People's Lives: The Vehicles for Change Story (referred as “Fw Vfc” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Supply chain.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Transforming People's Lives: The Vehicles for Change Story Case Study


VFC's primary purpose is to assist low-income families own vehicles so that they can achieve financial independence. Most of the vehicles VFC awarded to low-income families were donated. To supplement its budget, VFC also established a used car sales business called Freedom Wheels (FW) which soon became a profitable enterprise. Nearly all of FW's profits were transferred to support VFC's mission. Marty Schwartz, President of VFC, believed that allowing FW to retain more of its profits would allow it to grow its used car business which would bring even larger financial benefits to VFC in the long-run. In the short-term, however, this would reduce the number of vehicles awarded to low-income families-a sensitive issue for many members of his board. At the upcoming board meeting, therefore, Schwartz's primary challenge was to present an assessment of the potential impact on the vehicle award program of allowing FW to retain more of its profits, and to recommend what percentage of its profits FW should be allowed to retain. He was also prepared to examine other options for growing VFC's revenue, and to consider the wisdom of spinning-off FW as a separate for-profit entity.


Case Authors : Tigineh Mersha, Christine Nielsen, Ven Sriram, John C. Weiss

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Supply chain




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Transforming People's Lives: The Vehicles for Change Story Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014409) -10014409 - -
Year 1 3457787 -6556622 3457787 0.9434 3262063
Year 2 3954264 -2602358 7412051 0.89 3519281
Year 3 3971774 1369416 11383825 0.8396 3334778
Year 4 3229121 4598537 14612946 0.7921 2557766
TOTAL 14612946 12673888




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2659479

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fw Vfc have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fw Vfc shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Transforming People's Lives: The Vehicles for Change Story

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fw Vfc often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fw Vfc needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014409) -10014409 - -
Year 1 3457787 -6556622 3457787 0.8696 3006771
Year 2 3954264 -2602358 7412051 0.7561 2989992
Year 3 3971774 1369416 11383825 0.6575 2611506
Year 4 3229121 4598537 14612946 0.5718 1846260
TOTAL 10454529


The Net NPV after 4 years is 440120

(10454529 - 10014409 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014409) -10014409 - -
Year 1 3457787 -6556622 3457787 0.8333 2881489
Year 2 3954264 -2602358 7412051 0.6944 2746017
Year 3 3971774 1369416 11383825 0.5787 2298480
Year 4 3229121 4598537 14612946 0.4823 1557254
TOTAL 9483240


The Net NPV after 4 years is -531169

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483240 - 10014409 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fw Vfc to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fw Vfc has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fw Vfc can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fw Vfc, then the stock price of the Fw Vfc should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fw Vfc should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Transforming People's Lives: The Vehicles for Change Story

References & Further Readings

Tigineh Mersha, Christine Nielsen, Ven Sriram, John C. Weiss (2018), "Transforming People's Lives: The Vehicles for Change Story Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


IGD SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Lighthouse SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Taylor Devices SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


CubeSmart SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Nice ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


MeiHua Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


OS SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Chow Tai Seng Jewellery SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products