Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Nuclear Power & the Language of Diplomacy: Negotiating a Game-Changing Nuclear Trade Agreement with India case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by R. Nicholas Burns, Pamela Varley. The Nuclear Power & the Language of Diplomacy: Negotiating a Game-Changing Nuclear Trade Agreement with India (referred as “Nuclear Negotiation” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

This decision-forcing case focuses on a diplomatic challenge faced by US Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns and Indian Foreign Secretary Shyam Saran between April and July 2005: the writing of a 400-word joint statement and framework agreement that-if they were successful--would be the first step in a very complex negotiation between the United States and India to establish a civil nuclear trade pact. The bulk of the case consists of background material, explaining why the Bush Administration favored the negotiation of such a pact, though it reversed 30 years of US foreign policy with respect to nuclear weapons proliferation. It summarizes several important topics, crucial to understanding the issues involved in the negotiation of the joint statement: the history of US-Indian relations, India's history with respect to nuclear weapons, and issues in the international nuclear non-proliferation agreements. It gives an example of the kind of word-smithing Burns and Saran would have to engage in, to complete the joint statement. And it explains, in brief, five areas of particular difficulty that the two diplomats would have to address in some fashion. A brief sequel describes an 11th hour crisis in the negotiation and its resolution, provides the text of the final joint agreement, and very briefly summarizes the final outcome of the three-year negotiation that followed. Case Number 2023.0

Years | Cash Flow | Net Cash Flow | Cumulative Cash Flow |
Discount Rate @ 6 % |
Discounted Cash Flows |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Year 0 | (10021539) | -10021539 | - | - | |

Year 1 | 3468482 | -6553057 | 3468482 | 0.9434 | 3272153 |

Year 2 | 3956489 | -2596568 | 7424971 | 0.89 | 3521261 |

Year 3 | 3971839 | 1375271 | 11396810 | 0.8396 | 3334833 |

Year 4 | 3245214 | 4620485 | 14642024 | 0.7921 | 2570513 |

TOTAL | 14642024 | 12698760 |

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,

How it is calculated,

How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and

Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value

2. Internal Rate of Return

3. Payback Period

4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on
**Discounted Cash Flow **
technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Nuclear Negotiation shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Nuclear Negotiation have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn

**Less** Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.

r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate.
Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.

Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.

Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.

Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.

Step 4 – Selection of the project

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Nuclear Negotiation often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Nuclear Negotiation needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years | Cash Flow | Net Cash Flow | Cumulative Cash Flow |
Discount Rate @ 15 % |
Discounted Cash Flows |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Year 0 | (10021539) | -10021539 | - | - | |

Year 1 | 3468482 | -6553057 | 3468482 | 0.8696 | 3016071 |

Year 2 | 3956489 | -2596568 | 7424971 | 0.7561 | 2991674 |

Year 3 | 3971839 | 1375271 | 11396810 | 0.6575 | 2611549 |

Year 4 | 3245214 | 4620485 | 14642024 | 0.5718 | 1855462 |

TOTAL | 10474756 |

(10474756 - 10021539 )

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years | Cash Flow | Net Cash Flow | Cumulative Cash Flow |
Discount Rate @ 20 % |
Discounted Cash Flows |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Year 0 | (10021539) | -10021539 | - | - | |

Year 1 | 3468482 | -6553057 | 3468482 | 0.8333 | 2890402 |

Year 2 | 3956489 | -2596568 | 7424971 | 0.6944 | 2747562 |

Year 3 | 3971839 | 1375271 | 11396810 | 0.5787 | 2298518 |

Year 4 | 3245214 | 4620485 | 14642024 | 0.4823 | 1565014 |

TOTAL | 9501496 |

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9501496 - 10021539 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Nuclear Negotiation to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Nuclear Negotiation has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Nuclear Negotiation can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Nuclear Negotiation, then the stock price of the Nuclear Negotiation should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Nuclear Negotiation should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

** R. Nicholas Burns, Pamela Varley (2018)**, "Nuclear Power & the Language of Diplomacy: Negotiating a Game-Changing Nuclear Trade Agreement with India Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

- SEWA (B): Ela Bhatt Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Job Corps Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Barbara Norris: Leading Change in the General Surgery Unit Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Children's Hospital and Clinics (A) Net Present Value (NPV)Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Paul Levy: Taking Charge of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (A) Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis

- Hutton Branch Manager (C) Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Sovereign Wealth Funds: For Profits or Politics? Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Nuclear Power & the Language of Diplomacy: Negotiating a Game-Changing Nuclear Trade Agreement with India Sequel Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Mano Dura: Mobilizing the National Guard to Battle Crime in Puerto Rico Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis
- Role of Market-Based and Committee-Based Standards Net Present Value (NPV) Case Study Solution & Analysis

Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.

You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of Nuclear Power & the Language of Diplomacy: Negotiating a Game-Changing Nuclear Trade Agreement with India