EMI: FOR THE TRACK RECORD Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for EMI: FOR THE TRACK RECORD case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. EMI: FOR THE TRACK RECORD case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Benoit Leleux, Bryony Jansen. The EMI: FOR THE TRACK RECORD (referred as “Emi Luc” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurial finance, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of EMI: FOR THE TRACK RECORD Case Study

In Feburary 2006, Luc Gerard and Gerardo LeA?n, comfortably ensconced on their office sofa, were able to take a quiet moment to reflect which was a rare treat these last few months. A US$15.8 million investment had been staring them in the eyes for a while.Within the context of their previous employers, this amount would not have sounded out of place or even material. But for the first time, the two partners were talking about playing with their "own" money.The stakes were significantly higher! A few months earlier, they had joined forces to launch one of the first private equity funds in Colombia. Luc originated the idea: After a globetrotting corporate career engineering and managing mergers and acquisitions for others, he could no longer resist the urge to do his own deals. With their reputations and extensive networks in the corporate world, it would be easy to find potential deals. But finding the funds was a different story; this was a reputation-based business and they had no real personal track records. They would have to start from scratch and rapidly establish one to have a chance of raising the money. One company that looked particularly interesting was EMI (Emergencias Medicas Integrales), a Colombian healthcare company providing emergency services at home. While it had a respected brand, strong operations and healthy finances, it was clearly undermanaged and presented great value-creation opportunities through product development and geographic expansion. A minor problem, however, was that they did not have the money to acquire the company, let alone fund new acquisitions. A last-minute co-investor had saved the day, but they now faced decision time. Was EMI the company that would help them unlock the safes of the local institutional investors they wanted for their private equity fund? Would they be able to generate enough value and visibility quickly through this deal and establish themselves as deal makers? How should they treat this unexpected external investment for the deal? Was this taking them in a very different direction from the intended fund vehicle? Learning objectives: Building and managing a brand globally in the healthcare industry; Developing a micro health insurance system in Latin America; Globalization of brands; Growth financing and management in a global context; Emerging countries globalization; Building a new private equity vehicle.

Case Authors : Benoit Leleux, Bryony Jansen

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Entrepreneurial finance, Mergers & acquisitions

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for EMI: FOR THE TRACK RECORD Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10018629)	-10018629	-	-
Year 1	3467922	-6550707	3467922	0.9434	3271625
Year 2	3978389	-2572318	7446311	0.89	3540752
Year 3	3964569	1392251	11410880	0.8396	3328729
Year 4	3236456	4628707	14647336	0.7921	2563576
TOTAL			14647336		12704681

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2686052

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Emi Luc shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Emi Luc have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of EMI: FOR THE TRACK RECORD

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Emi Luc often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Emi Luc needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10018629)	-10018629	-	-
Year 1	3467922	-6550707	3467922	0.8696	3015584
Year 2	3978389	-2572318	7446311	0.7561	3008234
Year 3	3964569	1392251	11410880	0.6575	2606768
Year 4	3236456	4628707	14647336	0.5718	1850454
TOTAL					10481041

The Net NPV after 4 years is 462412

(10481041 - 10018629 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10018629)	-10018629	-	-
Year 1	3467922	-6550707	3467922	0.8333	2889935
Year 2	3978389	-2572318	7446311	0.6944	2762770
Year 3	3964569	1392251	11410880	0.5787	2294311
Year 4	3236456	4628707	14647336	0.4823	1560791
TOTAL					9507807

The Net NPV after 4 years is -510822

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9507807 - 10018629 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Emi Luc to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Emi Luc has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Emi Luc can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Emi Luc, then the stock price of the Emi Luc should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Emi Luc should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of EMI: FOR THE TRACK RECORD

References & Further Readings

Benoit Leleux, Bryony Jansen (2018), "EMI: FOR THE TRACK RECORD Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.