Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston and Dr. Bradford J. Shingleton (2004) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston and Dr. Bradford J. Shingleton (2004) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston and Dr. Bradford J. Shingleton (2004) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by H. Kent Bowen, Marcelo Pancotto. The Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston and Dr. Bradford J. Shingleton (2004) (referred as “Shingleton Shingleton's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston and Dr. Bradford J. Shingleton (2004) Case Study

Dr. Bradford Shingleton has developed some of the highest quality eye surgery techniques in the industry. He involves his nurses and technicians in creating a surgical service that is constantly improving. The case has many details about how Dr. Shingleton works with his staff and patients, and how the provider team focuses on patient care. A key measure of productivity for the surgery center is the time required in the operating room. Shingleton's numbers are impressive as they decrease each year. The business context relates to the particular patients, mostly require cataract or glaucoma surgery and the payer is Medicare/Medicaid, which regulates the price. Yearly decreasing prices make it more difficult for doctors to earn a good income unless they improve their productivity. Other surgeons in the practice do not copy Dr. Shingleton's practices nor use his trained surgical team. The dilemma relates to why his methods do not spread to other doctors and other clinics.

Case Authors : H. Kent Bowen, Marcelo Pancotto

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Leadership

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston and Dr. Bradford J. Shingleton (2004) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10019220)	-10019220	-	-
Year 1	3469205	-6550015	3469205	0.9434	3272835
Year 2	3975867	-2574148	7445072	0.89	3538507
Year 3	3968023	1393875	11413095	0.8396	3331629
Year 4	3229172	4623047	14642267	0.7921	2557807
TOTAL			14642267		12700778

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2681558

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Shingleton Shingleton's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Shingleton Shingleton's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston and Dr. Bradford J. Shingleton (2004)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Shingleton Shingleton's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Shingleton Shingleton's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10019220)	-10019220	-	-
Year 1	3469205	-6550015	3469205	0.8696	3016700
Year 2	3975867	-2574148	7445072	0.7561	3006327
Year 3	3968023	1393875	11413095	0.6575	2609040
Year 4	3229172	4623047	14642267	0.5718	1846290
TOTAL					10478356

The Net NPV after 4 years is 459136

(10478356 - 10019220 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10019220)	-10019220	-	-
Year 1	3469205	-6550015	3469205	0.8333	2891004
Year 2	3975867	-2574148	7445072	0.6944	2761019
Year 3	3968023	1393875	11413095	0.5787	2296310
Year 4	3229172	4623047	14642267	0.4823	1557278
TOTAL					9505611

The Net NPV after 4 years is -513609

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9505611 - 10019220 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Shingleton Shingleton's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Shingleton Shingleton's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Shingleton Shingleton's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Shingleton Shingleton's, then the stock price of the Shingleton Shingleton's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Shingleton Shingleton's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston and Dr. Bradford J. Shingleton (2004)

References & Further Readings

H. Kent Bowen, Marcelo Pancotto (2018), "Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston and Dr. Bradford J. Shingleton (2004) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.