×




Caterpillar Tunnelling: Revitalizing User Adoption of Business Intelligence Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Caterpillar Tunnelling: Revitalizing User Adoption of Business Intelligence case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Caterpillar Tunnelling: Revitalizing User Adoption of Business Intelligence case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Frances Leung, Murat Kristal. The Caterpillar Tunnelling: Revitalizing User Adoption of Business Intelligence (referred as “Tunnelling Caterpillar” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Caterpillar Tunnelling: Revitalizing User Adoption of Business Intelligence Case Study


Caterpillar Tunnelling Canada Corporation, a Toronto-based subsidiary of the U.S. company Caterpillar Inc., specializes in the custom design and manufacture of tunnelling boring machines used in the construction of transportation and utility tunnels such as subway, sewage and telecom cable tunnels. After the acquisition by Caterpillar, the company was chosen as one of the sites to undergo enterprise resource planning (ERP) transformation. After over a year of localization effort to adapt the corporate ERP template to the subsidiary's business processes, the project was called off due to both the strained local resources and the significant gap between the parent company's repetitive manufacturing model and the subsidiary's concurrent engineering/project-based model. Moreover, the lack of executive buy-in and a mandate in establishing company-wide performance metrics and consistency in business semantics led to sporadic user adoption of business intelligence tools and the creation of sometimes irreconcilable reporting. The business resource manager and head of finance has to rethink the management of business intelligence technologies and come up with a strategy to achieve coherent data analytics for effective business decision making. Authors Frances Leung and Murat Kristal are affiliated with York University.


Case Authors : Frances Leung, Murat Kristal

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Caterpillar Tunnelling: Revitalizing User Adoption of Business Intelligence Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010540) -10010540 - -
Year 1 3456013 -6554527 3456013 0.9434 3260390
Year 2 3972803 -2581724 7428816 0.89 3535781
Year 3 3953753 1372029 11382569 0.8396 3319647
Year 4 3239074 4611103 14621643 0.7921 2565650
TOTAL 14621643 12681467




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2670927

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Tunnelling Caterpillar shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Tunnelling Caterpillar have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Caterpillar Tunnelling: Revitalizing User Adoption of Business Intelligence

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Tunnelling Caterpillar often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Tunnelling Caterpillar needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010540) -10010540 - -
Year 1 3456013 -6554527 3456013 0.8696 3005229
Year 2 3972803 -2581724 7428816 0.7561 3004010
Year 3 3953753 1372029 11382569 0.6575 2599657
Year 4 3239074 4611103 14621643 0.5718 1851951
TOTAL 10460846


The Net NPV after 4 years is 450306

(10460846 - 10010540 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010540) -10010540 - -
Year 1 3456013 -6554527 3456013 0.8333 2880011
Year 2 3972803 -2581724 7428816 0.6944 2758891
Year 3 3953753 1372029 11382569 0.5787 2288052
Year 4 3239074 4611103 14621643 0.4823 1562053
TOTAL 9489007


The Net NPV after 4 years is -521533

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489007 - 10010540 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Tunnelling Caterpillar to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Tunnelling Caterpillar has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Tunnelling Caterpillar can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Tunnelling Caterpillar, then the stock price of the Tunnelling Caterpillar should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Tunnelling Caterpillar should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Caterpillar Tunnelling: Revitalizing User Adoption of Business Intelligence

References & Further Readings

Frances Leung, Murat Kristal (2018), "Caterpillar Tunnelling: Revitalizing User Adoption of Business Intelligence Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Aviva Pref SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Life)


Miracle Automation Engineering SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. & Agric. Machinery


TerraForm Power SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Merck&Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Mereo BioPharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Remsons Industries Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Pandora Media SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


ZECON SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Sieyuan Electric A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Somoto SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


SOCAM Development SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services