Environmental Remediation - A Problem to Manage Globally or Locally? Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Environmental Remediation - A Problem to Manage Globally or Locally? case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Environmental Remediation - A Problem to Manage Globally or Locally? case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Stewart Hamilton, Ivan Moss. The Environmental Remediation - A Problem to Manage Globally or Locally? (referred as “Remediation Environmental” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business, Organizational structure, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of Environmental Remediation - A Problem to Manage Globally or Locally? Case Study

The case sets out a dilemma faced within International Paper (IP) in deciding how best to manage a particular set of environmental responsibilities and liabilities - remediation to repair past instances of environmental pollution. Remediation issues are resolved over long time-frames because of their technical and regulatory complexity. In addition, the regulatory environment has been continuing to evolve. The underlying case issue is how best to manage corporate social responsibilities where both the number of liabilities and the future costs are uncertain. In this case, the number of remediation issues faced, the costs of remediation and the impact of future regulatory inflation are all unpredictable. Consequently through this case students see the wider external and internal context within which companies must manage their corporate social and environmental responsibilities and the underlying reasons for conflicts of interests between the different stakeholders.

Case Authors : Stewart Hamilton, Ivan Moss

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : International business, Organizational structure, Sustainability

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Environmental Remediation - A Problem to Manage Globally or Locally? Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002205) -10002205 - -
Year 1 3454050 -6548155 3454050 0.9434 3258538
Year 2 3953448 -2594707 7407498 0.89 3518555
Year 3 3957791 1363084 11365289 0.8396 3323038
Year 4 3229379 4592463 14594668 0.7921 2557971
TOTAL 14594668 12658101

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2655896

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Remediation Environmental have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Remediation Environmental shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Environmental Remediation - A Problem to Manage Globally or Locally?

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Remediation Environmental often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Remediation Environmental needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002205) -10002205 - -
Year 1 3454050 -6548155 3454050 0.8696 3003522
Year 2 3953448 -2594707 7407498 0.7561 2989375
Year 3 3957791 1363084 11365289 0.6575 2602312
Year 4 3229379 4592463 14594668 0.5718 1846408
TOTAL 10441616

The Net NPV after 4 years is 439411

(10441616 - 10002205 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10002205) -10002205 - -
Year 1 3454050 -6548155 3454050 0.8333 2878375
Year 2 3953448 -2594707 7407498 0.6944 2745450
Year 3 3957791 1363084 11365289 0.5787 2290388
Year 4 3229379 4592463 14594668 0.4823 1557378
TOTAL 9471591

The Net NPV after 4 years is -530614

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9471591 - 10002205 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Remediation Environmental to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Remediation Environmental has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Remediation Environmental can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Remediation Environmental, then the stock price of the Remediation Environmental should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Remediation Environmental should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

Negotiation Strategy of Environmental Remediation - A Problem to Manage Globally or Locally?

References & Further Readings

Stewart Hamilton, Ivan Moss (2018), "Environmental Remediation - A Problem to Manage Globally or Locally? Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.

Dor Alon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)

Silver Base Group Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)

Hifood SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products

Fairfax Financial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)

HDFC Bank SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks

eFORCE SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool

Guangji Pharm A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs