CONNECT: The Knowledge Network (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for CONNECT: The Knowledge Network (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. CONNECT: The Knowledge Network (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Joan Winn. The CONNECT: The Knowledge Network (A) (referred as “Connect Maureen” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Downsizing, Human resource management, Risk management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of CONNECT: The Knowledge Network (A) Case Study

In 1992, Maureen Clarry and Kelly Gilmore quit their jobs to start CONNECT: The Knowledge Network, an Information Technology Consulting company. Maureen and Kelly did not take a salary for the first six months of operation, and expected to keep expenses down by working out of their homes. When both women became pregnant, they had to redefine their business model and find a suitable office space. They found an old Victorian house with a separate building to serve as an on-site daycare center and proceeded to create a family-friendly office environment. They focused their business strategy on building a network of consultant "partners" to provide data warehousing and information systems consulting to large companies in the Denver area. In 1998, as companies attempted to expand their workforce in an increasingly tight job market, CONNECT added permanent-placement to their temporary-placement services. This new service line required an increase in CONNECT's workforce, and within a year, CONNECT expanded from 8 to 20 employees. The economic downturn of 1999-2000 prompted CONNECT to refocus the business once again, forcing a layoff of some long-time staff as well as its recently hired recruiters. This case chronicles the process that Maureen and Kelly and the entire staff of CONNECT went through in making the difficult downsizing decisions.

Case Authors : Joan Winn

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Downsizing, Human resource management, Risk management

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for CONNECT: The Knowledge Network (A) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012852)	-10012852	-	-
Year 1	3460773	-6552079	3460773	0.9434	3264880
Year 2	3964433	-2587646	7425206	0.89	3528331
Year 3	3959493	1371847	11384699	0.8396	3324467
Year 4	3237647	4609494	14622346	0.7921	2564520
TOTAL			14622346		12682198

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2669346

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Connect Maureen shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Connect Maureen have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of CONNECT: The Knowledge Network (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Connect Maureen often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Connect Maureen needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012852)	-10012852	-	-
Year 1	3460773	-6552079	3460773	0.8696	3009368
Year 2	3964433	-2587646	7425206	0.7561	2997681
Year 3	3959493	1371847	11384699	0.6575	2603431
Year 4	3237647	4609494	14622346	0.5718	1851135
TOTAL					10461615

The Net NPV after 4 years is 448763

(10461615 - 10012852 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012852)	-10012852	-	-
Year 1	3460773	-6552079	3460773	0.8333	2883978
Year 2	3964433	-2587646	7425206	0.6944	2753078
Year 3	3959493	1371847	11384699	0.5787	2291373
Year 4	3237647	4609494	14622346	0.4823	1561365
TOTAL					9489794

The Net NPV after 4 years is -523058

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489794 - 10012852 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Connect Maureen to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Connect Maureen has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Connect Maureen can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Connect Maureen, then the stock price of the Connect Maureen should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Connect Maureen should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of CONNECT: The Knowledge Network (A)

References & Further Readings

Joan Winn (2018), "CONNECT: The Knowledge Network (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.