×




Cambridge Consulting Group: Bob Anderson, Spanish Version, Spanish Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Cambridge Consulting Group: Bob Anderson, Spanish Version, Spanish Version case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Cambridge Consulting Group: Bob Anderson, Spanish Version, Spanish Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jay W. Lorsch, John J. Gabarro. The Cambridge Consulting Group: Bob Anderson, Spanish Version, Spanish Version (referred as “Dilemmas Producing” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy, Leadership.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Cambridge Consulting Group: Bob Anderson, Spanish Version, Spanish Version Case Study


Describes the situation facing the head of a rapidly growing industry-focused group within a consulting company. Highlights the dilemmas of being a "producing manager" (i.e., a professional who has both individual production as well as management responsibilities). Issues raised include: delegation, developing subordinates, developing an agenda, and building an organization. Teaching Purpose: Demonstrates dilemmas of the producing manager's role.


Case Authors : Jay W. Lorsch, John J. Gabarro

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Growth strategy, Leadership




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Cambridge Consulting Group: Bob Anderson, Spanish Version, Spanish Version Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008161) -10008161 - -
Year 1 3446428 -6561733 3446428 0.9434 3251347
Year 2 3953769 -2607964 7400197 0.89 3518840
Year 3 3951816 1343852 11352013 0.8396 3318021
Year 4 3228140 4571992 14580153 0.7921 2556989
TOTAL 14580153 12645198




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2637037

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Dilemmas Producing have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Dilemmas Producing shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Cambridge Consulting Group: Bob Anderson, Spanish Version, Spanish Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Dilemmas Producing often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Dilemmas Producing needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008161) -10008161 - -
Year 1 3446428 -6561733 3446428 0.8696 2996894
Year 2 3953769 -2607964 7400197 0.7561 2989617
Year 3 3951816 1343852 11352013 0.6575 2598383
Year 4 3228140 4571992 14580153 0.5718 1845700
TOTAL 10430594


The Net NPV after 4 years is 422433

(10430594 - 10008161 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10008161) -10008161 - -
Year 1 3446428 -6561733 3446428 0.8333 2872023
Year 2 3953769 -2607964 7400197 0.6944 2745673
Year 3 3951816 1343852 11352013 0.5787 2286931
Year 4 3228140 4571992 14580153 0.4823 1556780
TOTAL 9461407


The Net NPV after 4 years is -546754

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9461407 - 10008161 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Dilemmas Producing to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Dilemmas Producing has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Dilemmas Producing can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Dilemmas Producing, then the stock price of the Dilemmas Producing should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Dilemmas Producing should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Cambridge Consulting Group: Bob Anderson, Spanish Version, Spanish Version

References & Further Readings

Jay W. Lorsch, John J. Gabarro (2018), "Cambridge Consulting Group: Bob Anderson, Spanish Version, Spanish Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hanwha Techwin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Formcap Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Voya Prime Rate Trust SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Ausnutria Dairy Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Asia Pacific A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Tokio Marine Holdings Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Canacol Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Ch Soft Power SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment