×




Managing Knowledge at Booz-Allen & Hamilton: Knowledge On-Line and Off (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Managing Knowledge at Booz-Allen & Hamilton: Knowledge On-Line and Off (B) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Managing Knowledge at Booz-Allen & Hamilton: Knowledge On-Line and Off (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John Weeks, D. Charles Galunic, Joris Beerens, Robert Oushoorn. The Managing Knowledge at Booz-Allen & Hamilton: Knowledge On-Line and Off (B) (referred as “Booz Knowledge” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Organizational culture.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Managing Knowledge at Booz-Allen & Hamilton: Knowledge On-Line and Off (B) Case Study


Case B: An update bringing the reader current with developments in Booz Allen HamiltonA?s knowledge management strategy since Case A. Reinforces and deepens the point that knowledge management is a convergence of at least three factors: an appreciation of knowledge issues, the availability of sophisticated IT technology, and the managerial competence to suitably craft jobs and culture. This case takes the reader through the experiences of Booz-Allen & Hamilton in crafting their knowledge system and dealing with these factors.


Case Authors : John Weeks, D. Charles Galunic, Joris Beerens, Robert Oushoorn

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Organizational culture




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Managing Knowledge at Booz-Allen & Hamilton: Knowledge On-Line and Off (B) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022066) -10022066 - -
Year 1 3455539 -6566527 3455539 0.9434 3259942
Year 2 3965951 -2600576 7421490 0.89 3529682
Year 3 3951502 1350926 11372992 0.8396 3317757
Year 4 3247137 4598063 14620129 0.7921 2572037
TOTAL 14620129 12679419




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2657353

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Booz Knowledge shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Booz Knowledge have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Managing Knowledge at Booz-Allen & Hamilton: Knowledge On-Line and Off (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Booz Knowledge often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Booz Knowledge needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022066) -10022066 - -
Year 1 3455539 -6566527 3455539 0.8696 3004817
Year 2 3965951 -2600576 7421490 0.7561 2998829
Year 3 3951502 1350926 11372992 0.6575 2598177
Year 4 3247137 4598063 14620129 0.5718 1856561
TOTAL 10458383


The Net NPV after 4 years is 436317

(10458383 - 10022066 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022066) -10022066 - -
Year 1 3455539 -6566527 3455539 0.8333 2879616
Year 2 3965951 -2600576 7421490 0.6944 2754133
Year 3 3951502 1350926 11372992 0.5787 2286749
Year 4 3247137 4598063 14620129 0.4823 1565942
TOTAL 9486439


The Net NPV after 4 years is -535627

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9486439 - 10022066 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Booz Knowledge to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Booz Knowledge has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Booz Knowledge can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Booz Knowledge, then the stock price of the Booz Knowledge should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Booz Knowledge should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Managing Knowledge at Booz-Allen & Hamilton: Knowledge On-Line and Off (B)

References & Further Readings

John Weeks, D. Charles Galunic, Joris Beerens, Robert Oushoorn (2018), "Managing Knowledge at Booz-Allen & Hamilton: Knowledge On-Line and Off (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Quantum SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Storage Devices


Guangdong Liantai Environ SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services


Kp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Japan Pure Chemical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Modernland Realty Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Sutimco Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


ITX M2M SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


Agilent Technologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Katana Capital Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services