×




Developing and Diffusing New Technologies: Strategies for Legitimization Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Developing and Diffusing New Technologies: Strategies for Legitimization case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Developing and Diffusing New Technologies: Strategies for Legitimization case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jeremy Hall, Vernon Bachor, Stelvia Matos. The Developing and Diffusing New Technologies: Strategies for Legitimization (referred as “Legitimization Diffusion” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Research & development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Developing and Diffusing New Technologies: Strategies for Legitimization Case Study


Drawing on cases in agricultural transgenic technology and genomics in forestry, this article provides a framework to help managers develop strategies for more efficient technology development and diffusion. Strategies that fail to consider legitimization processes, especially in controversial social environments and/or varying institutional settings, could result in costly delays or promising technology left sitting on the shelf. Technology developers need to identify key technological, commercial, organizational, and societal uncertainties during the early phases of the technology's development, allowing them to shape the technology for more efficient diffusion.


Case Authors : Jeremy Hall, Vernon Bachor, Stelvia Matos

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Research & development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Developing and Diffusing New Technologies: Strategies for Legitimization Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029916) -10029916 - -
Year 1 3457807 -6572109 3457807 0.9434 3262082
Year 2 3960852 -2611257 7418659 0.89 3525144
Year 3 3947508 1336251 11366167 0.8396 3314404
Year 4 3246793 4583044 14612960 0.7921 2571764
TOTAL 14612960 12673394




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2643478

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Legitimization Diffusion shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Legitimization Diffusion have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Developing and Diffusing New Technologies: Strategies for Legitimization

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Legitimization Diffusion often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Legitimization Diffusion needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029916) -10029916 - -
Year 1 3457807 -6572109 3457807 0.8696 3006789
Year 2 3960852 -2611257 7418659 0.7561 2994973
Year 3 3947508 1336251 11366167 0.6575 2595551
Year 4 3246793 4583044 14612960 0.5718 1856364
TOTAL 10453677


The Net NPV after 4 years is 423761

(10453677 - 10029916 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029916) -10029916 - -
Year 1 3457807 -6572109 3457807 0.8333 2881506
Year 2 3960852 -2611257 7418659 0.6944 2750592
Year 3 3947508 1336251 11366167 0.5787 2284438
Year 4 3246793 4583044 14612960 0.4823 1565776
TOTAL 9482311


The Net NPV after 4 years is -547605

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9482311 - 10029916 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Legitimization Diffusion to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Legitimization Diffusion has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Legitimization Diffusion can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Legitimization Diffusion, then the stock price of the Legitimization Diffusion should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Legitimization Diffusion should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Developing and Diffusing New Technologies: Strategies for Legitimization

References & Further Readings

Jeremy Hall, Vernon Bachor, Stelvia Matos (2018), "Developing and Diffusing New Technologies: Strategies for Legitimization Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Enpro Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Kaufman Et Broad SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Mirland Development SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Kuribayashi Steamship SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Dr.Ci:Labo Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Me 2 On SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Miroku Jyoho Service SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Tsit Wing SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Avic Sanxin A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services