×




Two Tough Calls (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Two Tough Calls (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Two Tough Calls (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Joseph L. Badaracco Jr.. The Two Tough Calls (A) (referred as “Terminate Firing” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Ethics, Firing, Gender, Human resource management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Two Tough Calls (A) Case Study


A young female manager must decide whether to terminate two poorly performing managers who work for her. Shows the practical and ethical issues involved in firing decisions.


Case Authors : Joseph L. Badaracco Jr.

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Ethics, Firing, Gender, Human resource management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Two Tough Calls (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012275) -10012275 - -
Year 1 3461336 -6550939 3461336 0.9434 3265411
Year 2 3954237 -2596702 7415573 0.89 3519257
Year 3 3937666 1340964 11353239 0.8396 3306140
Year 4 3238943 4579907 14592182 0.7921 2565546
TOTAL 14592182 12656355




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2644080

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Terminate Firing shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Terminate Firing have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Two Tough Calls (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Terminate Firing often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Terminate Firing needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012275) -10012275 - -
Year 1 3461336 -6550939 3461336 0.8696 3009857
Year 2 3954237 -2596702 7415573 0.7561 2989971
Year 3 3937666 1340964 11353239 0.6575 2589079
Year 4 3238943 4579907 14592182 0.5718 1851876
TOTAL 10440784


The Net NPV after 4 years is 428509

(10440784 - 10012275 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012275) -10012275 - -
Year 1 3461336 -6550939 3461336 0.8333 2884447
Year 2 3954237 -2596702 7415573 0.6944 2745998
Year 3 3937666 1340964 11353239 0.5787 2278742
Year 4 3238943 4579907 14592182 0.4823 1561990
TOTAL 9471177


The Net NPV after 4 years is -541098

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9471177 - 10012275 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Terminate Firing to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Terminate Firing has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Terminate Firing can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Terminate Firing, then the stock price of the Terminate Firing should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Terminate Firing should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Two Tough Calls (A)

References & Further Readings

Joseph L. Badaracco Jr. (2018), "Two Tough Calls (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Prima Meat Packers SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Pentanova Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


Cytori Therapeutics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


ABC-Mart Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Apparel)


Kec Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Sienna Senior Living SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Cyient Ltd-B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Printing & Publishing


Clean & Science SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Axway SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Tokyu Construction SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services